Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiljusieppo
1) bigger volume = bigger data to analyze to improve
2) playing more zoom leads to improve game theory faster and more effectively than playing normal tables, making decissions more based on fundamentals and stats, not on some previous dynamics.
3) Max seems to be doing financially well out of poker which makes it imo. more valueable to play formats that give him a higher challenge and better opportunity to improve.
4) Nl100z is not so far from nl200 and part of improving is for most people to put in quite alot of breakeven volume. It might be not the most +EV in money but I think it will pay itself back at some point.
5) OP plays staked which makes the improving even more important compared to making moneys short term.
Yeah most of those are kinda valid points, but comment on few of those.
1) Yeah true, you get faster good sample of your own game. But then again, fixing leaks based on results in databse has always been something I haven't really been fan on. Requires so huge sample for it to be useful.
2) Don't agree at all. Just because you are playing in the same table many orbits you don't need to go all mttreg and 4bet 96s just because the V has 3bet you 3 times in a row. It's still very much the same in that sense. The fact that you don't have big sample on many villains yeah makes it more "anon" and need for good fundamental gameplan is maybe more important, true. Also I'm big advocate of learning off the tables instead of in game. Like do you really get x% better faster by playing 800 hands an hour instead of 400-500?
3) Yeah ok, but even if you like the challange is it better to have the challange to beat small stakes at a bit harder games, or to play more +EV games eariler to get faster to higher stakes and beat them like NL200-400+?
4) My point about the limits wasn't the skill level of certain stake, but the rake. Having 50% RB at <NL100 is a lot better than having 50% RB at NL1k.
When I started getting coaching and started climbing out of the micros, I was adviced to just farm out the high RB sites until I hit NL200, and then you can diversify to lower RB sites like stars etc. This is just because the rake at micros and SS is huge, and if you are able to have 30% extra RB, it can easily transfer into 2-3bb/100 into your bottom line. Which will make variance easier, and enable you to move up faster, which should be the goal. Anyone who is getting coaching from the bosses he is, shouldn't have an endgoal to beat NL100.
These posts weren't meaning to attack anyone. Variance is a *****, and I'm sure OP will make it with the coaching he is getting.