Yeah I'll have to do that. Otherwise next step is gamblers anonymous.
This is MTD. Down few thousand. Gladly there's a lot of RB. This downswing has just eaten me alive. Part of it is due to the high variance of HU. I don't really doubt my skill level since I was winning last 2 months. I haven't tilted and my game selection has been good. So I don't know what's going on, but I can't keep going this way. No matter how +EV you are, you can't ignore BRM.
Filters are ready. Unsure what goals do I set. I want to prove that I'm a man of my words and not a desperate degen. So let's do this 100-200.
So I don't know what's going on, but I can't keep going this way. No matter how +EV you are, you can't ignore BRM.
I mean no one can take it for granted that they are +EV in games they play. You need a huge sample to be sure, and after you got sample, the games have already progressed a lot. Not having an ego in poker is gold.
I don't want to be harsh, because you seem very enthusiastic about poker and nice guy, but -8bb/100 over 40k hand is unlikely to be just variance (not sure how much of that sample is HU which increases variance a lot).
Just keep working on your game and start moving slowly back up, maybe get some coaching to get your confidence back up. Getting someone who is better than yourself on HH review is superdupersuper golden and will often open your eyes some spots or a new way to think about stuff.
What follows is just my raw opinion based on your writings. You are leaking tremendous amount with youre non-showdown winnings. Don´t know where you base on being +EV on your games. Plus nothing indicates that you are applying any mathematical or game theory judgement on your reasoning. Self-help quotes aint gonna do the thing. You refer a lot of "having worked on my game", what is this work precisely youve done? As personally struggling with my game Im somewhat relief too see people with your gamebook still making it to MSNL, no offense.
Redline wr seems too low and the main issue here, should be like -10bb/100 so we are 'missing' 26 BI right there, and then showdown wr is on the low side as well especially when taking into account that redline is what it is.
What follows is just my raw opinion based on your writings. You are leaking tremendous amount with youre non-showdown winnings. Don´t know where you base on being +EV on your games. Plus nothing indicates that you are applying any mathematical or game theory judgement on your reasoning. Self-help quotes aint gonna do the thing. You refer a lot of "having worked on my game", what is this work precisely youve done? As personally struggling with my game Im somewhat relief too see people with your gamebook still making it to MSNL, no offense.
fwiw theory is one of my stronger areas, and also a weakness vs aggro regs who bluff too much.
wrt. what I've done. I took 4 hours of coaching last month. And i.e I review all my HU matches hand to hand. I also work a lot with different programs (flopz/equilab) etc.
I know there might be a perspective issue. What makes sense to you doesn't necessarily make sense to others.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDefiniteArticle
FWIW when I run poorly my redline tanks moreso than my blue line, but I play a high WWSF style which I'm not sure fishtankz does.
Also, 2 months' play is far from enough to assume you're a winner at a limit unless you're doing >5bb/100 over that period.
prob not a secret based on the graph that I don't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeKiii_Fish
Just read the quote thread good luck with recovering at lowstakes again
cheers
Quote:
Originally Posted by PandaLife
Redline wr seems too low and the main issue here, should be like -10bb/100 so we are 'missing' 26 BI right there, and then showdown wr is on the low side as well especially when taking into account that redline is what it is.
been looking for the "secret to success" wrt. red line, but haven't found it yet. I know there are some big winners with negative red line (ishter + the 7bb/100 guy (JonIrenicus??))
Quote:
Originally Posted by doctor877
I mean no one can take it for granted that they are +EV in games they play. You need a huge sample to be sure, and after you got sample, the games have already progressed a lot. Not having an ego in poker is gold.
I don't want to be harsh, because you seem very enthusiastic about poker and nice guy, but -8bb/100 over 40k hand is unlikely to be just variance (not sure how much of that sample is HU which increases variance a lot).
Just keep working on your game and start moving slowly back up, maybe get some coaching to get your confidence back up. Getting someone who is better than yourself on HH review is superdupersuper golden and will often open your eyes some spots or a new way to think about stuff.
I would never claim to be +EV at Stars if it wasn't for the fish. I can still look at the player pool even at 1k and I have good understanding of what everyone is doing. Then you take this knowledge to euro sites, it's hard to expect you would be -EV vs weaker regs.
Overall it's just really hard to understand why would I suck so so much. Like really suck, be very bad player. Maybe I have some strengths. Perhaps this month I haven't been able to use those strengths, I've had to deal with my weaknesses. who knows. Cheers everyone.
Yeah I'll have to do that. Otherwise next step is gamblers anonymous.
This is MTD. Down few thousand. Gladly there's a lot of RB. This downswing has just eaten me alive. Part of it is due to the high variance of HU. I don't really doubt my skill level since I was winning last 2 months. I haven't tilted and my game selection has been good. So I don't know what's going on, but I can't keep going this way. No matter how +EV you are, you can't ignore BRM.
This seems very contradictory to me. If it's high variance then 2 months is not a good sample size.
And obviously we need to add RB to the graphs. RB adds maybe ~3bb/100 to my winrate.
Going to play lower limits today in order to get some momentum going. I don't care if there's big whale at 400+. Have to resist the temptation.
I have some ideas what to work on. The big picture is still quite unclear wrt. what I'm doing wrong. It's clear based on the graph that I don't bet and call enough. Sometimes rightfully so... It's a big equation.
We'll see.
h2: think betting is the only way to win the pot. reg is capped, so I'm mainly looking to get fish out of the way. It's closer to a fold than a call imo
h5: vs the aggro fish. I think he's uncapped wrt. Ax so probably gotta fold.
someone tell me if fish float KdTx KdJx QdX and then turn them into a bluff, and we should call
h6: I don't think he would bet loose mw. I don't typically xb turn with 8x so I guess we gotta fold. Raising is an option tho, but I think bet/bet/bet > raising with this line.
River:(43.05 BB, 2 players) 5
UTG bets 32.6 BB and is all-in, fold
UTG wins 42.83 BB
h8: think this is a close call because I would expect him to start checking w his overpairs. Did not understand how wide his range can be. bad fold imo. normally I don't fold TP but this seemed close enough, but it's not.
Hand 1) I don't like this cbet with our holdings tbh. I also think that if we're going to cbet our sizing should be smaller
hand 2) I play the same
hand 3) I think we have to bet/call here, we have enough bluffs and also thinner value bets that we can bet/fold
hand 4) Probably play the same but vs golo never getting hu in a hand with him in the first place is the most +ev thing to do.
hand 5) I probably don't cbet flop as played. May as well toss a coin on river since you will never know where you're at vs aggro fish with this line. If he's aggro I am very happy checking back flop to call a lot of turn and river bets.
Hand 6) probably bet turn when checked to with a large proportion of our rnge.
hand 7) Same problem as hand 5, you're not polarised enough with your cbetting, you're merging hands that have showdown value and getting into silly spots where you bet flop as a weird value/bluff then check turn cause you're not sure where you are when they call flop, and finally are completely lost range wise when they bet river. This is also apparent in your hu game too and seems to be a running theme in some of these hands. It's not necessarily a leak, some guys crush when merging everything (some high stakes russians) but I get the feeling that you make 100 hero calls a day and it just doesn't seem to make any sense to me.
Hand 8) In game I usually call but I actually think it's a good spot to fold. We have a ton of hands that we will prefer to continue with on turn than this, so seems good.
H1: flatting is some much better than 3betting imo. I get that your trying to iso the fish here but JTs plays amazingly 3way and getting 4b sucks so much
H2: I think 3betting T9s vs the fish is better than just flatting on the cut off
H3: std
H4: I think is either a shove or a fold on the river
H5: check back the flop, I don't like you cbet size either
H6: fine
H7: I much prefer check the flop, we getting bluffed off our equity to much when he just decides c/jams XhX
H8: yeh pretty clear turn call
Last edited by JesusEatsCheese; 01-19-2016 at 11:33 PM.
Reason: Might as well ignore this post as ponty's is obv much better :P
JTcc w/ the wide fish in SB I think squeezing and playing vs the fish HU very often is going to be good (call obv. good too), but not sure about the c-bet. Probably should just check and bluff turn or river
T9cc I think is a very clear 3b or fold given positions and players left to act.
Cheers for the feedback.
Main thing to take away: Cbet sizings + board texture 3bp.
I have to say about the first hand. the aggro fish would nearly always bet when you check back the flop, so best way to exploit that is to bet the flop ourselves and hope that he folds. Probe betting from aggro fish is the most frustrating thing ever. He had 36% FTCB, so I obviously want to get value when ever I have something. I xb something like A2 weak Ax TP since it's more valuable to get a bluff from him. I'm maybe a bit paranoid in this regards, but I've tried to figure out just how wide fish float flops.
Playing vs wide range is great, but you have to learn how to exploit that, which I think is the key to success vs fish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pontylad
hand 7) Same problem as hand 5, you're not polarised enough with your cbetting, you're merging hands that have showdown value and getting into silly spots where you bet flop as a weird value/bluff then check turn cause you're not sure where you are when they call flop, and finally are completely lost range wise when they bet river. This is also apparent in your hu game too and seems to be a running theme in some of these hands. It's not necessarily a leak, some guys crush when merging everything (some high stakes russians) but I get the feeling that you make 100 hero calls a day and it just doesn't seem to make any sense to me.
I like to bluff catch/heroC wide vs fish. On the flop I'm looking for folds. Fish have wide range for calling 3-bets, so on monotone board there should be a lot of fold equity. Hand selection maybe not the best tho, but I think vs fish we can bluff this board.
If he bluffs all KhJx KhQx KhTx QhJx ThJx and doesn't vb thinly, we would have a call imo.
@Broken
reason for cold calling T9s is that there was a 60 VPIP fish in the BB. Being in the CO we can also play back vs a sqz, so cold calling is reasonable.
In fairness, i didn't really look at your pf play, agree with the others about 3 betting T9s hand, JTs is fine. Disagree with folding the Js being standard though, In fact that statement has to be wrong. If this was true than you're saying we only have a bet/calling range of nuts? I'm sorry but we've got a lot of hands that we are value betting the river with here, we also have a decent amount of hands that we will bluff the river too. you will be hugely exploitable if your calling range is only nut flushes. I just can't see that ever being correct.
It's a different type of bluff when your opponent could have the nuts. It takes more guts to pull it off (bluffing into an uncapped range)
so there's probably some kind of psychological fear of not bluffing the spot. I'm also struggling to figure out which hands he should bluff. I think mid stakes regs don't just bluff ATC, there's some logic behind the bluff.
Main reason why I think it should be a call is my sizing. I'm trying to rep a bluff/thin vb with this sizing, think I'd take different sizing w/ As. Having 2 sizings for bluffs seems a little weird tho, so maybe I bet As this sizing too. It seems like he cant have much OTR...
anonymous tables
those are overall stats for every player who has taken seat on seat 1, seat 2 etc.
I don't believe in buying hand histories anyways, at least if you play on games that will evolve over time.
h2: think betting is the only way to win the pot. reg is capped, so I'm mainly looking to get fish out of the way. It's closer to a fold than a call imo
h5: vs the aggro fish. I think he's uncapped wrt. Ax so probably gotta fold.
someone tell me if fish float KdTx KdJx QdX and then turn them into a bluff, and we should call
h6: I don't think he would bet loose mw. I don't typically xb turn with 8x so I guess we gotta fold. Raising is an option tho, but I think bet/bet/bet > raising with this line.
River:(43.05 BB, 2 players) 5
UTG bets 32.6 BB and is all-in, fold
UTG wins 42.83 BB
h8: think this is a close call because I would expect him to start checking w his overpairs. Did not understand how wide his range can be. bad fold imo. normally I don't fold TP but this seemed close enough, but it's not.
H1 half pot accomplishes the same as 2/3 sizing wrt folding out very weak stuff. Also think we rarely want to use this sizing with any parts of our value range.
H2 Looks good, also hard to imagine over calling the 3b isn't the best play.
H3 Bet/call he competent. Bet/fold a good exploit vs fish and weak regs.
H4. Meh. Call and fold EV going to be close, don't mind being nitty.
H5. Either cbet 1/3 here or check back. 2/3 flop is just not a good game plan on this texture with relevant positions.
H6. Raise flop. Ranges are super close on this flop, we probably have a slight advantage. This seems like one of the nut combos to raise.
H7. Checking back flop and calling turn is probably better. As played, I think river is a call.
H8. Seems like this hand should be in our call turn/fold river range UI.
H9. Good.
Sorry for quoting, on my phone and couldn't check the hands.
^^ Cheers, I'll check tomorrow.
Just a quick results update. Few coolers, played decent. Need to keep the amount of tables under control, otherwise decent day. I'm playing these lower limits (100-200) with a lot more aggressive mindset. I have the skill advantage so there's a lot of 3-betting.
This grind will continue for a while until I'm out of the hole and have gained my confidence back.
Reason why you can have high wr at 100nl. Rarely happens at 400+ (vs reg I assume)