1/3, 4-5handed late at night, villain joined table from another a bit late, and is quite active and very aggressive, three betting quite a bit pre, and staying active post. He's not too wild, is def. a comptent player, though I suspect his aggression is a bit too much and could be a leak: I have yet to find out for sure.
Hero has pretty tight image, haven't 3! more than once in the hour or so he's been here.
330 eff.
5 handed, V raises to 10 UTG, fold, I raise to 30 on BTN with T
T
, folds back to him who calls.
FLOP (60): Q
4
5
He checks, I think about checking back and just calling down, maybe betting if checked to. Instead I bet 30; he thinks and makes it 110.
Hm, tough spot, seeing as his value range is so narrow it just looks so FOS. I have a tough time seeing him do this with a Q, since he should know my range is weighted towards JJ+, AK, he shouldn't want to commit himself with a raise and fold out all worse, always getting called by better. This is sort of why I just wanted to x/back and call down on most boards, just risk letting him draw free for one street.
On the other hand, this spot could honestly be desirable if he really is just going to make a move like this, and the bet is to induce. Still don't know him well enough though. Thoughts in general?