Quote:
Originally Posted by Javanewt
Why? This is a good hand vs. these players. I know it's going 3-way (maybe 4), it's cheap, and it's a good hand to see a flop with.
If you are folding these hands, you are not going to play any hands, which is fine, but I'm happy with this.
BTW, would you like to comment on river?
Pre -
My initial commentary refers to a thought processes that has no impact on making money. "Cheap" and "...Using my image" is not a professional approach when deciding how play/construct your ranges.
If anything, you should recognize just how expensive it actually is to flat and if you are really looking to exploit your own image then you should compare flatting to the EV of 3b pre if you expect to find folds early in the hand.
This 1/3/10 game doesn't sound very deep, but seems very big. The gameflow is going to be somewhat important to how you want to adjust (if you're adjusting) your ranges/how you play them so that you might want to be very aggressive at the margins or very tight preflop.
River - I would likely just ck-give up a lot with this combo. If compelled to bluff, I would rather look at the prospects of ck-r > leading river anyway.
It's a very messy equation trying to come up with a +EV bluff and you cannot fall victim to the fallacy ITT that you have to bet your very worst hand at 100% frequency just
because you're "at the bottom of your range".
It doesn't work that way. There are more important factors to consider.
Sauhund is likely far closer to Vs actual calling range than you were in OP, and when trying to solve for the right bluff size, you also have to allow for the possibility that V decides to re-bluff sometimes with some hands.