Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbledygeek
H1:
After this many limpers I'm either raising a lot more to make sure I narrow the field (I'd probably go $25 to also setup a commitment spot postflop with TP, knowing that if I took down 5.5 bbs here it would a fine result) or I'd just overlimp (which isn't as bad as most will have you believe, imo).
Next time give pot size on each street so we know relative betsizes going in. Reads on players would also be helpful. With an SPR of 3 against the smaller stacked player and 4 against the other guy, you could argue we are committed here. Although at the same time I'd feel very uncomfortable about it against anyone with half a clue (which is why overlimping preflop isn't horrible). Alarm bells really should be going off in our head when both players call this flop; ok, it sounds like short guy might be calling weakly, but WTF is other guy overcalling with on this board?
As I say, next time say stack sizes, but I"m guessing we're probably committed against short villain, but uncomfortably so. But I'm guessing he's overvalueing a worse Ace enough of the time here. Frankly, I'm more interested in WTF the other guy called the flop with.
H2:
I'd be overlimping here almost always, but you somehow managed to narrow the field to HU in position with initiative, which is fine if that is the expected result (I'd expect that exactly never at my table with this many limpers and this preflop sizing).
Again, next time post pot sizes on streets. Looks like SPR is 7 or so, so we need 3/4 PSBs to get things in by the river, so I'd just bet/bet/bet that. I think we shoulda set things up so that we coulda shoved river ourselves for stacks.
My guess is that we lost both these hands, and that happens. However, one thing I will say is that both of these hands aren't monsters preflop, and yet we built very big pots to make it trivial to play for stacks with them; it's *possible* we might want to reconsider that (depending on what Villain ends up showing up with).
GcluelessNLnoobG
Thanks for the feedback! Much appreciated. Hand 1, I had no idea what the other guy was doing in the hand. He was playing really strangely the whole time I was at the table, and actually called an all in bet with ace high (obviously lost a lot of money), so I was pretty happy to have him in the pot. I realize I should have sized a little more considering the amount of limpers, so I will definitely consider that for the future. I considered the main villain in this hand extremely weak. He was bluffing just about every hand down to show down and had been an ATM for the table.
For hand one, I really don't see many alarms going off even with a call on the flop. V1 and V2 are surely pre flop raising with any pocket pair and AJ-AK. V1 ended up having A7o
For hand two, I may need to just adjust my game up. I am fairly consistently aggressive on the button, especially with that many limpers ahead of me. Same villain held Q8o this hand. So flopping full houses against me for my stacks twice in two hours. Just hurt a little...