Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***Official "It Lives, It Lives" Chat Thread*** ***Official "It Lives, It Lives" Chat Thread***

04-12-2012 , 08:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMurder3
I was just in my 4L and saw venice there. I was wondering if he was there to check up on my moderating or for some low-content chatter.

Nope. He's there for our scantily clad asians
I was checking up on your modding of scantily clad asians for Mason since he was losing his bankroll to mpethy.
04-12-2012 , 09:39 AM
at some point we are into the law of diminishing returns.

Due to rake and the limitations of cards we have come up with this arbitrary max win rate of:

~ 20 $/hr @ 1/2
~50 $/hr @ 2/5

but then at 5/10 it apparently drops down to ~80 $/hr with some tiny tiny % @ 100 $/hr (like 1 or 2 players per player pool)

and then at 10/20 it drops down further to 120 $/hr with some tiny tiny % @ 200 $/hr (like 1 or 2 players per player pool)

As we coach the fish in our pool and people become better if you don't yourself become better your winrate will slowly drop to break even
04-12-2012 , 09:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illiterate
My results and the level of my play seem to have an inverse relationship. I ran hot for six weeks, was happy that I was winning, but got somewhat down on myself because I felt like I leaked a dollar away for every dollar I won.

I've hit a mild/moderate break-even stretch since then, but I feel like I've been rapidly improving and plugging postflop leaks during it. I had my biggest career loss this week, but was proud of myself, as I felt like I made the fewest mistakes I've made during a session in a long time.

Does anyone else feel like they learn the most in the face of adversity (negative results in a poker player's case)?
The big thing is to not let the positive variance blind you to how bad you play.
04-12-2012 , 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11t
at some point we are into the law of diminishing returns.

Due to rake and the limitations of cards we have come up with this arbitrary max win rate of:

~ 20 $/hr @ 1/2
~50 $/hr @ 2/5

but then at 5/10 it apparently drops down to ~80 $/hr with some tiny tiny % @ 100 $/hr (like 1 or 2 players per player pool)

and then at 10/20 it drops down further to 120 $/hr with some tiny tiny % @ 200 $/hr (like 1 or 2 players per player pool)

As we coach the fish in our pool and people become better if you don't yourself become better your winrate will slowly drop to break even
I think u also need to factor in the buyin amount, softness of the games, and the availability of bigger games.

IMO, a $500 max action 1/2 game with consistant straddle and restraddle which is the biggest NLHE game in town can be beat for a higher wr than a nitty 2/5 game with a $300 cap which is the second smallest game in the casino.

Illeterate: It is normal to spend more time studying your game when u r on a downswing
04-12-2012 , 10:07 AM
Well a 1/2 game with a constant straddle isn't a 1/2 game. It is a 1/2/4 (or w/e) game.

I would like to play in a 1/3 1k max buyin game
04-12-2012 , 10:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMurder3
I was just in my 4L and saw venice there. I was wondering if he was there to check up on my moderating or for some low-content chatter.

Nope. He's there for our scantily clad asians
Hmmmm... 11:42 pm Venice is in the 4L... Yeah, can't be good.
04-12-2012 , 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAOxEaglex
Man, without Pokerstove I would have quit a long time ago. Variance is truly incomprehensible to the human mind.
Lmao
04-12-2012 , 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11t
Well a 1/2 game with a constant straddle isn't a 1/2 game. It is a 1/2/4 (or w/e) game.

I would like to play in a 1/3 1k max buyin game
would u consider a 1/2 game with frequent restraddles for $10 to be a $5/10 game then?
04-12-2012 , 10:32 AM
Just seen a Unicorn Ace, 7bet shove with 107o into the tightest player on the big game 0Human0 aka IgNit. IgNit calls the 7bet shove and says "I need a king" lmao.
04-12-2012 , 10:37 AM
He had KK
04-12-2012 , 10:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fun101
would u consider a 1/2 game with frequent restraddles for $10 to be a $5/10 game then?
Yeah assuming the max buyin is deep enough

I mean the people itt claiming that somehow being short stacked doesn't affect winrates are just wrong. a 1/2 game with a 1k buyin with mandatory restraddles to 10 should play like a 5/10 game. If the straddles are just common you'll get some mean average where it plays like a 2/5 or 4/8 game.
04-12-2012 , 11:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokahBlows
NHL playoffs started today, how come its not on tv? Didn't even know they had a hockey team in nashville. Detroit lost ****.
Played my weekly session last night. They had all the games on in the poker room. Nothing beats sitting at a poker table playing cards while keeping an eye on the opening round of the NHL playoffs.

3 of the teams I've picked for hockey pool purposes to finish in the final 4 are currently down 1-0.

Gthankfully,IrunbetterinpokerthanIdoinhockeypoolsG
04-12-2012 , 11:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11t
Yeah assuming the max buyin is deep enough

I mean the people itt claiming that somehow being short stacked doesn't affect winrates are just wrong. a 1/2 game with a 1k buyin with mandatory restraddles to 10 should play like a 5/10 game. If the straddles are just common you'll get some mean average where it plays like a 2/5 or 4/8 game.
Typical internet argument ITT where people seem not to be paying attention to what the other side says. No one is saying playing shorter won't reduce your win-rate. Lots of people are saying that it won't reduce your win-rate in a linear fashion.

So the fact you win $50/hr with 100bb doesn't mean that if you reduce stacks to 60bb you will win $30/hr. It will be reduced, imo, at a rate that is somewhere below linear.
04-12-2012 , 11:32 AM
Yeah but what I am saying is that it is probably impossible to win 50 $/hr @ a 2/5 game with 300 dollar buyin and a flat drop
04-12-2012 , 11:35 AM
I don't want to get into an argument about the specific numbers. That may be right, I'm not really sure.

But you are certainly right that whatever your win-rate is at 500 cap it will be something lower at 300 cap.
04-12-2012 , 11:41 AM
Haha it wasn't an argument it was a debate! Anyway it is completely irrelevant because nobody will ever be at their long term win rate.
04-12-2012 , 11:46 AM
The structure of the game PB plays in is truly sucky, and the fact that there are a bunch of tables is offset by the fact that there really aren't that many deep whales. If there are eight games going and yours isn't that good, chances are the other seven aren't any better.

The few players who gamble gambool and spew chips, do it $200 or $100 at a time. I used to crack up playing with those guys. They'd buy in for $200, get whittled down to $40, call a PFR for 15, and a flop cbet of 20--leaving themselves $5 behind in case they hit their flush draw.

I have no idea what possible WR is for that game (I was an overall loser at it and stopped playing quickly). PB, why don't you play HG more than commerce? Do stack sizes stay small there?

When you move up, are you planning to play the 400 buyin game, or the 500-1500?
04-12-2012 , 11:50 AM
Playing anything than the 5/10 1.5k game at commerce sounds completely foolish imo
04-12-2012 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jack492505
Typical internet argument ITT where people seem not to be paying attention to what the other side says. No one is saying playing shorter won't reduce your win-rate. Lots of people are saying that it won't reduce your win-rate in a linear fashion.

So the fact you win $50/hr with 100bb doesn't mean that if you reduce stacks to 60bb you will win $30/hr. It will be reduced, imo, at a rate that is somewhere below linear.
We're also mostly ignoring what the other side is doing. If you are going to win 10bbs /hr in a 2/5 game, that means a couple people have to lose more than that and sustain their loss rate.

Except those players tend to run out of money at times.
04-12-2012 , 12:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SABR42
well sucking is relative

I suck compared to Tom Dwan, but in my $2/5 game I might as well be Tom Dwan

beating $2/5 game for 6bb/hr is pretty solid, if unspectacular
Do you play in a 500 cap game? I think 50/hr is about the ceiling for a 500 cap game, 1k is obvious a ton different.

The thing I've noticed over the past year is how many more people will buy in for 200-400 instead of 500 in my local 2/5 game. It sucks hard.
04-12-2012 , 12:12 PM
The worst thing about when people buy in for 200 is that I level myself into calling their jams or jamming back with JJ/TT/AQ and am like good 0% of the time.
04-12-2012 , 12:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeuceKicker
The structure of the game PB plays in is truly sucky, and the fact that there are a bunch of tables is offset by the fact that there really aren't that many deep whales. If there are eight games going and yours isn't that good, chances are the other seven aren't any better.

The few players who gamble gambool and spew chips, do it $200 or $100 at a time. I used to crack up playing with those guys. They'd buy in for $200, get whittled down to $40, call a PFR for 15, and a flop cbet of 20--leaving themselves $5 behind in case they hit their flush draw.

I have no idea what possible WR is for that game (I was an overall loser at it and stopped playing quickly). PB, why don't you play HG more than commerce? Do stack sizes stay small there?

When you move up, are you planning to play the 400 buyin game, or the 500-1500?
I play at 3 different casino's with that structure. But I just alternate depending on what my mood is. I like HG better then commerce. Its all the same, Any given night you will see guys sitting on 300bbs+. Stacks get deep it just takes a long time. The key is to make yourself play long sessions. The structure is basically like a tournament. When you get a deep stack you just flip with the small stacks.

When I move up I play 5/10 500-1500. The 400 game is crap.

I just play to survive and take care of my kids.
04-12-2012 , 12:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11t
The worst thing about when people buy in for 200 is that I level myself into calling their jams or jamming back with JJ/TT/AQ and am like good 0% of the time.
Those hands crush my short stacking range. I must be doing it wrong.
04-12-2012 , 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Heh, does he know you?
I introduced myself, but I'm 99% sure he wasn't paying attention.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
I'll ship you $20 on Merge if you slip him a 2+2 gang sign when one of you cashes out. Pics or it didn't happen.
Heh, didn't see this until this morning.

Quote:
Originally Posted by venice10
WTF!?!? MM supposedly hates to play NL. Or are you screwing around at limit?
Mason played a solid tag style for three or four hours and left up a little. I don't think he got fancy at all. The only possibility is when he 3 bet my cut off open--he might have been light, as it was the 4th or 5th orbit in a row I opened from either the cut off or the button. But I folded, so idk.

I didn't bust his roll, as Venice suggested might happen. I finished up on him 1bb, lol.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMurder3
I was just in my 4L and saw venice there. I was wondering if he was there to check up on my moderating or for some low-content chatter.

Nope. He's there for our scantily clad asians
I love that thread. Also the women with athletic bodies thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SABR42
It's just amazing how badly I run right now.

Tonight in 3 hours:
semi-bluffed a 12-outer (fd + overcard vs top pair) and missed
ran AKo into AA 5-handed, vs the only other aggressive player at the table
lost with 66 in a re-raised pot (I opened to $15 and called $25 more) when the board ran out 6-5-2-5-A, and he got there on the river.

I'm down $4550 in my last 7 hours of play, stretching back to Sunday night. It's pretty ****ing hard to lose 9+ buy-ins in like 220 hands.

As I was cashing out (after the 66 hand) I took my fist, aimed it at the wall and gave it my thoughts. It was a cheap drywall and I made a hole, oops. Security detained me and made me pay $300 damage, but didn't charge me any further (standard 24-hour ban). I didn't think that cheap wall costs $300 to fix, so when they had two guys escort me to the parking lot afterwards, I deliberately walked as slowly as possible to protest, and when we got to the elevator, I took the stairs instead and made them climb 3 floors with me.

You could say I'm having a bad week.
Sorry you're running bad. 9 buy ins in 7 hours is pretty much as bad as it gets. Eh, I don't mean that as a prediction. You know what I mean. Brutal down swing.

You know you crush that game, though. You know that these 9 buy ins have only dented your win rate a bit. Go back and calculate your win rate for the last 3 months--you're probably still in the neighborhood of $70/hr or something ridiculous like that.
04-12-2012 , 01:13 PM
Punching the wall is ridiculous though, I am surprised you didn't get life banned

      
m