Quote:
Originally Posted by PayOffWizard1987
1/2 NL - Horseshoe Hammond
Effective Stacks: $200, I just sat down at the table 5 minutes ago, this is one of my 1st hands.
Villain: Villain is a super-solid player, mid 20s white guy, we are friends at the casino, and always talk and have a good time when we are at the same table. We are both winning regulars and have played with each other dozens of times. We disagree on a lot of strategy, but I think I know his game pretty well. Also, an important note is that, I don't think he would try to bluff me. We have tangled a lot in the past, and we played a lot of big pots together, but thats only because of the situation, for the most part we try to stay out of each other's way, and don't try to outplay each other just because of our ego's.
|
I want to address this, if he is the better player and you are the lesser player, then what you said above would "feel" right but it wouldn't be right when in reality he bluffs you all the time and you just don't know it. He just does a good job of picking spots to bluff you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PayOffWizard1987
Preflop: Hero raises to $8 in EP with A  Q  , Villain calls in MP, SB calls, BB calls. $8 is my standard open, and I always open for this amount to prevent giving away any bet-sizing tells. Villain is aware of this, so villain is putting me on any pair 22-AA and any big cards JTs-AK
|
Geezus how I hate this. This is like 1980s poker, seriously and is losing just so much freaking value.
#1) Majority of fish just aren't paying attention.
#2) Majority of fish call raises with inferior RIO
#3) Bigger preflop raises makes for easier play post flop as you narrow ranges
Seriously, villains aren't thinking "He always raises $8, maybe he has AA or maybe AK damn... you never know with that guy because he always raises the same". No. When you raise $8 villains are thinking, "I got my lucky cards, glad the raise is only $8 so I can call and hope I hit my hand because the only way you can beat this game is to hope to get lucky on the flop..."
If you were to "always" raise a set amount, raise $18 as a standard raise. By raising $8 you are balancing in the wrong direction, you are playing your strong hands weak.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PayOffWizard1987
Flop: ($32) 8  7  5  BB checks, Hero bets $20, Villain raises to $60, SB folds, BB folds, Hero calls.
[I] Since I c-bet into 4 people I think Villain is putting me on a big pair.
|
Hate to be a douche, but this makes me want to invent a new poker term, the thinking-fish. This is the most bizarro logic i've ever heard of. Your whole logic of raising $8 as a "standard" raise is so that they can't put you on a big pair. So explain to me how in the HELL V is supposed to "now" put you on a big pair? Just because you c-bet? When 90% of all players cbet???
What V is thinking is "I hit my hand/draw I'm going to raise."
Quote:
Originally Posted by PayOffWizard1987
Flop: ($32) 8  7  5  BB checks, Hero bets $20, Villain raises to $60, SB folds, BB folds, Hero calls.
Since I c-bet into 4 people I think Villain is putting me on a big pair. He made it $60 pretty fast, and I am almost 100% positive he flopped a set or 2pair. I think if I hit a heart on the turn I can easily stack him, there's $112 in the pot and $40 to call so i'm getting ~3-1, with the implied odds I think its a call i'm not sure tho, maybe i should've folded.
|
If you call pot will be roughly $150 and there will be a PSB remaining. So calling is the worse option because if we brick turn and he shoves turn we now have incorrect odds to call. So this is a clear shove. Two overs plus nut draw.
We have the most equity on the flop so why not get the money in WHILE we have the most equity? Calling in this spot is what weak-tight fish do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PayOffWizard1987
Turn: ($152) 8  Hero checks, Villain checks.
Probably the worst card in the deck for me, I am pretty sure he has a full house now, and that's why he checked, his hand is too strong and he wants to show weakness hoping I would call a big value-bet on the river with my AA.
|
WTF??? really??? A full house is a possibility, no doubt about that. But let me ask you a question? What do you think V would do if he had K

T

What about 76s, 66, 99, TT??? These are all hands that are well within V's range so I don't understand your propensity to see MUBs.
incidentally, notice how uncertain you are? V's range is wide and the biggest reason for it is the $8 preflop raise. He could call that $8 raise with a range of 40% easy which is ridiculously wide.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PayOffWizard1987
River: ($152) 2  Hero checks, Villain bets $100, Hero?
I forgot to mention that I have noticed that he plays his draws pretty passively which i never understood, so I don't think he is raising me on the flop with a flush draw, maybe he would do it with the nut-flush draw but I have that so I exclude that from his range. The only hand I can beat in this spot is 75 for a flopped 2pair, which he doesn't have because he would've gotten counterfeited and wouldn't bet the river, a flush which we already ruled out he doesn't have, and a straight, which I think he would continue betting on the turn. Thoughts?
I fold face up and Villain mucks, so I'm guessing he had it because I'm sure he'd love to show me a worse hand
|
This is absolutely disgusting. If V is a thinking player WHY WOULD HE SHOW THE BLUFF??? you are his gravy train, you see MUBs at every turn. Why would he want to end his easy money and show you he bluffs. No, if he has half a brain he will say, "Damn, I had quads, good fold!!!"
I want to touch on this subject. Your claim for raising the same weak ass amount is becuase you don't want to be exploitable by players noticing your raise amounts which is pretty high level... So if these players are at such a high level then it stands to reason these same players WOULD NEVER show you their bluffs right?
I've got to be honest, if I ever was at the table with you, I would flat 100% of all your raises, raise you 100% of the time and shove 100% of all rivers against you.
I've read many of your posts and I think you understand basic poker theory and concepts however you use that knowledge to reinforce weak-tight passive play.
I guess its possible to be a winner at 1/2nl being a weak-tight passive thinking player, but there is no way your winrate is ever going to be higher than 3-4bb/hr tops.
The problem I see is that you are caught in a vicsious circle of passiveness. The more passive you play the more you reinforce your play thus the more passive you will play.
You've got to learn to ramp up the aggression a lot. You've got to take advantage of all the mistake LLSNL players make. Reading your posts I think you've got the concepts and theories down but you are missing that vital component necessary to take this to the next level...
balls.
And I know, I sound like a condescending know it all douchebag prick, but man, i've got to tell you that you played this hand just like all the weak-tight players that I prison rape every single day. Whenever given the choice between passive or aggressive plays they will always choose the passive play and justify it in some convoluted self serving manner. Its like the fear of being wrong or losing a pot at showdown is too much for them to even contemplate...
Flop is a clear shove when he raises you AINEC. And then the fact that you actually hit your hand and then fold river getting about 2.5:1 on your money when there are lessor hands that can bet the river.
If this V has lots of history with you and is a thinking player please explain to me how his bluff frequency against you isn't through the freaking roof? Any thinking player that witnessed you play this hand would raise you RELENTLESSLY on flop/turn and then bet you off on river with a 2/3 pot bet. I mean, why the hell not? You are a LAG's wet dream come to life. You raise small, bet small, don't semi-bluff, then fold river WHEN you hit your hand on a scary board for a less than pot sized bet...