Main Vaillin (BTN) 200bb effective: Really nice bloke but a whale, limp calls far too often pre and folds on most flops. Hero has been relentlessly C-betting against him on flops with value and bluffs and has taken it down either on flop or turn almost every time. Hero bluffed river in a large pot and villain snap folded a missed draw. Plays transparently, bets what he deems as value hands, checks weaker hands, checks draws a lot too, hardly EVER raises
Hero (HJ) Covers: Winner at the table, perceived image probably LAG. Raising a lot in position and taking pots down at showdown often. Sometimes bets value on flops, sometimes doesn't. Has made several hero calls with second pair with good reads and was good all but one time (5/6 times was good, got owned by rivered house lol). Hero usually plays TAG but I felt LAG was the best approach to take at this table, and especially against villain.
OTTH
Pre Flop
UTG Limps, UTG+2 Limps, Hero raises to 7bb (standard raise) with A
T
in the HJ, button (Villain) calls, UTG +2 also calls
Flop (22bb): A57 Rainbow
UTG+2 checks, Hero checks, villain bets 10, UTG folds, hero calls
- Wish such a dry flop I couldn't see myself being paid on 3 streets with this hand, so planned on betting turn and river if hero checked back flop, or calling down in most spots otherwise
The Turn (42bbs): 6... Board now A576 (Rainbow)
Hero Checks, Villain bets 22bb, hero calls
- Same logic as above, planning on check calling most if not all rivers
The River (86bbs): T... Board A576T
hero checks, Villain bets 32bb, Hero?
I can see credit for all three options here (admittedly very few for folding, but the argument could be made). Let me know what you would do, and why. Thanks