Quote:
Originally Posted by twitcherroo
I like the concept, but I think the stack sizes make this a little awkward. You’re repping a L high or Q high flush? Would you really over PSB jam the turn with the effective nuts? Or with a smaller flush? I think a thinking V would look you up with AQ+, maybe as low as A10. Certainly V is calling with a set or straight. I think generally multi street bluffs work better than a single bullet but the stacks don’t really allow for that here. Probably works because the absolute size of the bet is large but I wouldn’t attempt it versus a moron or thinking player. Nitty, Mubsy players surely fold.
I agree with you because of stack sizes. But it's close.
Hero:
"if villain is competent, he will be able to fold a smaller flush/set"
Really?
I seriously doubt whether a competent or incompetent V would fold a set or a straight or even a small flush (which I think he'd jam ott). V's range/line suggest he's ahead. He's raised pre-flop, c-betted and led turn with something other than napkins presumably.
And V is getting ~1.8:1 to call H's turn xr (as V has 295 behind here if I'm adding correctly) effective jam, so V may like his chances.
That said, jamming is high variance but has more EV than calling. I think H has maybe 20-25% FE against V range (targeting JJ/KQs - 9 combinations) of (AA-TT, KQs/KJs, AK/AQ/AJ/ATs) and maybe 27% actual equity against this range. And H is never getting paid for his NF if he hits it so the hand is mostly over ott.
I'd rather try this move against a deeper V who would feel less pot committed and where my FE was likely higher.. But that's what makes a horse race. AP I think V will find a sigh call.