|
|
| Live Low-stakes NL Discussion of up to 3/5 live no-limit, pot-limit and spread-limit Texas Hold'em poker games, situations and strategies. |
06-16-2012, 06:35 PM
|
#1
|
|
newbie
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 16
|
99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
Only been at the table for 320 minutes, have not played a pot yet. The stacks at this table are all deep, ranging from $500-$1200. I bought in for $200 and villain has $1000. He has raised or reraised 80% of hands and just won a big pot when he 3bet pre with Ac8c and somehow got the pot to $500 when he hit runners for the nut flush vs a set. He bet and called a big raise on the flop with air before getting the draw OTT.
Villain is sb ($1k)
Hero is MP ($200)
Folds to hero, raises to $12 with 9h9d. Folds to sb, raises to $33. Hero calls.
Flop ($68) Jc8c2s
Villain bets $45
Hero?
Hero calls $45, turn 10c. Villain checks, hero?
I almost feel like shipping the flop since i like my hand against his extra wide range, but i also want him to keep the aggression up. I would probably fold to a K or A turn, but not much else.
Thanks for the help.
|
|
|
06-16-2012, 07:31 PM
|
#2
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,362
|
Re: 99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
ship it pre.
|
|
|
06-16-2012, 08:03 PM
|
#3
|
|
enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 81
|
Re: 99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
I would probably just check the turn, youre either way ahead or behind. I would have 4bet preflop though.
|
|
|
06-16-2012, 08:12 PM
|
#4
|
|
centurion
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Too far from a casino, NY
Posts: 164
|
Re: 99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
Quote:
Originally Posted by sauhund
ship it pre.
|
Given your $200 stack, you aren't calling $33 pre for set value. So, shipping over his big raise pre seems like a good possibility, as does shipping the flop with no A or K. (This last assumed you have reads that his raises mean big cards.)
|
|
|
06-17-2012, 12:38 PM
|
#5
|
|
newbie
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zqzeek
Given your $200 stack, you aren't calling $33 pre for set value. So, shipping over his big raise pre seems like a good possibility, as does shipping the flop with no A or K. (This last assumed you have reads that his raises mean big cards.)
|
Thats the problem, his raises seem to mean anything, i just think a ton of his range has at least one big card. I dont love shipping pre, but i thought shipping flop was probably best. $113 pot vs my ship of $167, slight overbet but probably the most optimal.
As played, we both checked turn, river was Kc for a four flush on the board. He led out for $50 and i had to fold with two red nines. He showed As4d.... i immediately maxed my buyin
|
|
|
06-17-2012, 12:40 PM
|
#6
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,593
|
Re: 99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
What was drunk's 3-bet frequency?
I would 4-bet and ship flop.
You can't avoid variance against drunk players or play on a wild table.
|
|
|
06-17-2012, 12:41 PM
|
#7
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 4,014
|
Re: 99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
Easy 4 bet pre.
|
|
|
06-17-2012, 12:44 PM
|
#8
|
|
banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,418
|
I like a 4 bet pre
|
|
|
06-17-2012, 01:37 PM
|
#9
|
|
adept
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Inside the mind of Bill Fillmaff
Posts: 763
|
Re: 99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
320 minutes and no reads damn what've you been doing all that time
nah but as others have said gotta 4b pre, either all in or with the intention of shoving any flop. 99 is a tough hand to play post flop and when you're against a crazy villain who has shown he'll 3b pre somewhat light, why make things tougher than they need to be? you're beating his range pre, just raise
|
|
|
06-17-2012, 02:35 PM
|
#10
|
|
The Situation
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wolverine> sexually ambiguous acorn
Posts: 3,659
|
Re: 99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
im getting it in pre.
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 05:00 AM
|
#11
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,448
|
Re: 99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgmccoy01
Thats the problem, his raises seem to mean anything, i just think a ton of his range has at least one big card. I dont love shipping pre, but i thought shipping flop was probably best. $113 pot vs my ship of $167, slight overbet but probably the most optimal.
As played, we both checked turn, river was Kc for a four flush on the board. He led out for $50 and i had to fold with two red nines. He showed As4d.... i immediately maxed my buyin 
|
Am I wrong for wanting to call on the river? After the turn is checked through, I would expect villain to make a lot of bluffs on the river, even on a scary board. We only need to be good a low percentage of the time. The guy is a drunk maniac who just checked the turn. We can't assume that he has it.
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 08:43 AM
|
#12
|
|
grinder
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 537
|
Re: 99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
so by the time we put in $33 pre the pot is $68 and we have $167 behind. A pot sized 4bet would leave us with roughly $100 behind otf with a pot of $204
Against a typical villain a 4bet shove here is bad b/c they will most likely fold when beat and call when ahead, but this villain has shown a willingness to gamble so we can get called by worse and presumably he will fold a significant part of the time allowing us to just pick up the pot. I think shoving in a sense is the conservative play here b/c making a smaller 4 bet risks villain hitting a higher pair on the flop then we have to get it in nearly dead since we can't fold many flops
So I'd shove pf
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 11:42 AM
|
#13
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,923
|
Re: 99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
Gotta 4bet pre and be prepared to ride the variance train, because even maniacs pick up hands sometimes. One thing you should consider however is not to flat 3bets HU for set-mining purposes. You ended up putting in $33 with 99 preflop getting barely 6:1. This is horribly -EV and a big leak. Remember, you want somewhere between 10:1 or 20:1 implied odds to make setmining worthwhile. You just arent going to hit often enough to make calling $33 raises profitable, even when you do hit your set and stack him.
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 11:46 AM
|
#14
|
|
grinder
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Who Dat City
Posts: 434
|
Re: 99 facing 3-bet vs drunk maniac
ONLY 320 minutes??? That's nearly 5 and a half hours. Is the 2 a typo? I'll just assume that you meant to put 30 minutes. Okay....anyway.......
Can you please explain why in the world you did not 4 bet pre flop? This guy is a "drunk maniac" as you said...your 99 are probably very good here, so why are you just calling? With a decent pair or AQs or better and 100bb against a maniac that 3 bets me, I'm looking to get it all in pre flop.
|
|
|
06-19-2012, 05:26 PM
|
#15
|
|
newbie
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redsoxnets5
320 minutes and no reads damn what've you been doing all that time 
|
Yeah, meant 30 mins
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 AM.
|