Quote:
Originally Posted by MIB211
Fair enough he probably never has 77, but how come he can't have other broadways combos? AJ or AT are pretty much equivalent to KQ.
I guess I just think KQs plays better than AJ/AT because of the opportunity for open ended draws (preflop at least).
Also, given the way the hand played out on the flop and the turn, I think AT doesn't bet the turn unless he has AsTx and I don't think that's a 3bet calling hand pre for villain. AJ maybe but again, it'd have to be way more likely to be AJ suited than AJo and then he wouldn't have the flush draw and I don't know if he bets that turn 100% of the time for 1/2 pot. Clearly if he has a straight draw and K high, there's no way he's winning the pot so he has to be bluffing, which is why I think that's a way more likely hand. Also permutations and such make KQ more likely than AJ