Hero: 20s aggro player, has been pretty active in the last hour picking up a lot of playable hands and winning some small and medium pots with bluffs, probably has loose image currently. covers table, monster stacking at like 1k
Villain: late 20s early 30s white guy reg, familiar with hero and knows hero is familiar with him as well. super ultra mega nit. im talking never plays a hand unless hes raising (and doesnt even do that often), will fold in the small blind for 1 more dollar with queen 10 offsuit, the type of guy who exploits the fact that in 1/2 you dont need to be balanced against fish at all. but he's a good player and knows how to value and play his hands properly. stack ~350
Hero holds A
A
in the small blind.
Villain opens to 8 from EP, gets 1 caller from MP, folds to Hero who 3-bets to 27. folds back to Villain who calls, other player folds, heads up to the flop.
(65) flop J
J
10
Hero checks to Villain for some balance and to offer him the opportunity to bluff with the rare draw or think that QQ/KK is the best hand / pot control against Jx holdings, although Villain would probably check back a draw. Villain does take the lead, bets 30. Hero calls
(125) turn 10
Hero checks to Villain, not loving the turn as we're losing to a lot of stuff now and Villain is never showing up with a draw if he bets again, only a boat or very rare QQ/KK putting Hero on some kind of big combo draw that he'll call with. Villain bets, but only bets 35. This small sizing gives Hero the chance to still put Villain on that marginal hand targeting a draw, definitely not loving my hand anymore but for 35 I feel like I have to call so I do.
(195) turn A
Hero suddenly has aces full and knows Villain probably couldn't immediately put him on that but if Villain had QQ/KK he would be folding to any lead out
here anyway, and a 10 might check back but a jack or quads would bet. So Hero checks, and Villain does bet, 75, and he only has 150 behind. Hero? How can we get called by worse here against such a tight opponent, he has to know that if we make any reraise right now we're never bluffing him here. even a jack-x hand might fold giving respect to AJ, AA, or quad 10s, we've seen this guy make hero folds in similar spots before where we thought he might just be committed.
Hero ultimately ends up deciding on just flat calling the 75, because this particular player might even just fold a jack-x hand to a value jam here, except ace-jack but the problem is we double block ace jack so he would need the last ace in the deck. there's two combos of ace-jack we get value from (and actually he might have folded A
J
to my 3-bet pre), but there's also one combo of quad 10s and one combo of quad jacks that we're value towning ourself against, and he would play both of those hands the exact same way in regards to sizing wondering what the heck he's getting value from. The both fortunate and unfortunate part of this hand is that he did not have either of the quads but had exactly A
J
, the one main hand that we could definitely get value from. Do you agree with my decision-making here or should we have just taken the open 50-50 on 2 combos of ace jack vs 2 combos of quads and jammed and just hoped he would call with the jack-x hands sometimes to make it a profitable jam?
Last edited by aojiru_sss; 05-26-2017 at 05:13 AM.