that's more checking and folding that feels cool to me, but I suppose the key is that wacky is way behind on this board range v range so yes he has to surrender a lot in a tiny pot.

100% exactly =D He can't even raise much... ever. I like to describe this as his range is Handcuffed

Why can't BB raise?? I'm assuming most don't 3b from the BB, so BB has a bunch of big aces and sets in his range. CO should also be checking back a decent amt of turns.

avoid didn't say he can't raise at all. He suggested raising 15%.

Range vs Range equity drives % action

CO open should still be fairly wide.

Pretty sure if BB only continues on pair, GS, or FD, his range will be stronger than villains cbet range

So avoid I have a serious second level question.

You say 50/35/15 as your range buckets, and that intuitively makes sense to me. But how do you build those ranges such that they each have enough equity to be useful going forward? Obviously the 50% check/fold gets all the **** boxes, but on a given board with a given range your equity could be spread out VERY different over your possible holdings with which you want to continue. How do you build those ranges?

without busting out all combonator to "solve" teh spot... I'd adopt something similar to
-only xr 75% of my nut hand (nut hands only consist of AT+)
-only xr 25% of my obvious hands (obv hands consist of A4o+
-roughly half my straight draws/fds
-roughly 25% of my backdoor nonshowdownable 3 straights/3flush combos)
(56hh on AK4ddh) ALSO enough of my suited bull****ty stuff to keep the correct alphas on turn cards that connect with my distribution (e.g. J7hh/98hh on AK4ddh) Another way to say this is I need to have these hands on a AdKd4hTd turn card.

Only really adding enough of the last group to control the RvR EQ targets.
the whole idea is to create a XR range taht has ~57-59% equity vs his flop cbet range

hopefully that gives a general idea. If we really wanted too we could sit down and I can show you how to build the ranges out to account for future cards + retain the right frequencies + RvR EQs =D I'm setting up a turn barrel of 70-80%.

Personally I love XR wider + cbetting next street less, as people have not been in that spot as often and will more regularly dumpster themselves. you know... that whole theory of poker ****. donk/3bet xr xr is my lover. When playing against good players I like to opt for balance lines often when the RvR EQ's support the decisions for these reasons. Vs passive fish the opposite is true

yea, poker n' stuff.

I should really post more, but i'll stick to streaming this content for now =D