Quote:
Originally Posted by C Put 6163
In most cases I am c-betting for one of two reasons: 1) The pot is small with only one or two villains and a bet has a chance of taking the pot; or 2) The pot is large enough that I am likely going to have odds to draw another card and will call a bet; so I'd rather keep control and potentially buy some outs. (I don't consider betting for value to be a c-bet). If I can narrow the field down to one or two villains on the turn, I often will bluff if I have air on the turn.
Question 1: Why would you want to spend a lot of money to buy a small pot?
Question 2: Why do you want control of a pot? Maybe you should consider the reasons to bet/raise. If you haven't read Theory of Poker, you should. "Keeping the betting lead" isn't actually a reason to bet.
Question 3: (The bold one), why re-define cbetting? CBetting is just betting when you have the previous betting lead. You could do it for value, you could do it as a bluff. There might be other reasons. Do you know them? The action is just an action. Seems like you're talking OOP, so this leads to...
Question 4: If you know how to use pokerstove (I prefer equilab, and so should you), let's look at some board textures. loose/passive villain who raises JJ+, KJs+, AQo+, and ATs+ limps in EP. Two others (let's assume same raising range, to keep it simple) limp in middle and late position. You raise A
K
in small blind. Big blind somehow folds. 4 ways to the flop. What is your equity on each of the following boards?
Winning poker is about winning money in the long run and not winning pots in the short run. It seems like once you've raised preflop, you really want to just maximize the chance of winning the pot. If you raised in what will be a 4 way pot and you are 40% likely to win the pot overall, you've just won a ton of money. As long as you don't squander that profit the 60% of the time you don't win the pot.