Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Look Calli: I sincerely apologize for that entire episode. January LC/NC Look Calli: I sincerely apologize for that entire episode. January LC/NC

01-06-2015 , 01:36 PM
I would find it hard to stake people better than I am because I would find it difficult to evaluate their play, unless it's like post-BF and an online wizard had his/her entire roll stuck on FT or something.
01-06-2015 , 01:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
I've done both.
So I am in the minority of stakes gone good for you. BTW, thank you for that. It made the transition to 20 so much easier.

I quickly realized how much money I was losing to you and decided to stake myself.

Was I one of the players better or worse than you that you staked? I do realize this was eons ago.
01-06-2015 , 02:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
I've done both.
About which kind did you feel more confident at the start?
01-06-2015 , 03:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yodaman
So I am in the minority of stakes gone good for you. BTW, thank you for that. It made the transition to 20 so much easier.

I quickly realized how much money I was losing to you and decided to stake myself.

Was I one of the players better or worse than you that you staked? I do realize this was eons ago.
I considered you better than me at the time simply because ben and bakku liked you
01-06-2015 , 03:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munga30
About which kind did you feel more confident at the start?
Quite frankly they all make me vomit now and I'm down to 1.5 horses.
01-06-2015 , 04:54 PM
Well, tallying results was a KITN.

Basically I Robin Hooded a chair from 30+ to 20- (the latter including 200 max and 6/12 O8).
01-06-2015 , 05:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by callipygian
Well, tallying results was a KITN.

Basically I Robin Hooded a chair from 30+ to 20- (the latter including 200 max and 6/12 O8).
So you ran good?
01-06-2015 , 06:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
So you ran good?
I have a negative RGR. That's better than infinity!
01-06-2015 , 06:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
No chance anyone on this forum beats any of the top 5 three handed bots. Zero.
What would those be?
01-06-2015 , 10:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by callipygian
What would those be?
Whoever posted positve wrs in the three.way bot Olympics. Alberta......and four others.
01-06-2015 , 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by callipygian
I have a negative RGR. That's better than infinity!
Shameless plug

http://jessetakesashot.blogspot.com/...ratio.html?m=1
01-06-2015 , 10:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by callipygian
I have a negative RGR. That's better than infinity!
Lol Que
01-06-2015 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
Lol Que
When BBs won and dollars won have opposite signs, RGR goes negative.
01-07-2015 , 12:20 AM
Two 2/4s, LAPC start already?
01-07-2015 , 12:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brown Keeper
Two 2/4s, LAPC start already?
No, just 1 fish and another got stuck at 1/2.
01-07-2015 , 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DosXX
No, just 1 fish and another got stuck at 1/2.
Everybody go play!!!
01-07-2015 , 04:51 PM
If you have money on carbon and would be willing to fire a sports play for me drop me a line i'm looking to get down big.
01-07-2015 , 05:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
Everybody go play!!!
Rake is unbeatable at 2/4.
01-07-2015 , 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by callipygian
Rake is unbeatable at 2/4.
Confirm both two fours unbeatable
01-07-2015 , 05:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeese
If you have money on carbon and would be willing to fire a sports play for me drop me a line i'm looking to get down big.
Pass on taking the Broncos. Everyone wants to pick them, but go easy on that one.
01-07-2015 , 06:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougL
Pass on taking the Broncos. Everyone wants to pick them, but go easy on that one.
Not the play
01-07-2015 , 06:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougL
Pass on taking the Broncos. Everyone wants to pick them, but go easy on that one.
He's going to take the 1,000,000:1 odds that a surprise tornado touches down in Foxborough and kills every member of both the Patriots and Ravens.
01-07-2015 , 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by callipygian
He's going to take the 1,000,000:1 odds that a surprise tornado touches down in Foxborough and kills every member of both the Patriots and Ravens.
Closer
01-07-2015 , 07:36 PM
I actually advised my Vegas bound coworker to put down on the Broncos at 7:1 (footballoutsiders.com has them as something like a 17% chance of winning the SB, and their divisional round matchup v the Colts is far easier than the Patriots one v the Ravens).
01-07-2015 , 11:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
Closer
What is better:

1. Two teams you hate play each other in the divisional round, ensuring one is eliminated but also ensuring one survives, or

2. Two teams you hate each play a team you don't hate, leaving open the possibility that both are eliminated?

      
m