Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
jeese posts a hand jeese posts a hand

08-29-2014 , 06:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by phunkphish
I'm saying QTcc shouldn't be in your cbet, x/f turn range (for most turns). It belongs in your double barrel range (for most turns). Alternately, it can also go in your PF folding range or PF calling range. Hurray for ranges.
Agree to disagree
jeese posts a hand Quote
08-29-2014 , 06:29 PM
Just jam money in the pot. Tilt equity when you river a club is worth any price.
jeese posts a hand Quote
08-31-2014 , 07:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob148
Maybe a value range something like 77, 66, 55, AA-JJ? 33 combos. Dude's getting 8.5:2 on a turn raise call, so I wanna bluff ~ 30% of the time. Back of my hand says ~10 bluffs. AKdd, AKcc, AQdd, AQcc, AJdd, AJcc, ATdd, ATcc, A9dd, A9cc. I don't have any room in my bluffing bin for Qxs unless I'm trying to exploit a high raise fold %.

I'd just call the turn raise and hope to hit something.
Are you planning to bet the river with a lot of your missed draws if it goes 3-bet - call on the turn? If you are, then why is it better to 3-bet bluff with your A-high flush draws here which have the most showdown value? My understanding is that it is normally better to construct a bluffing range with the least showdown value but with the most outs if we are going to continue the bluff on the river. Is there an exception here?
jeese posts a hand Quote
08-31-2014 , 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaGun
Are you planning to bet the river with a lot of your missed draws if it goes 3-bet - call on the turn? If you are, then why is it better to 3-bet bluff with your A-high flush draws here which have the most showdown value? My understanding is that it is normally better to construct a bluffing range with the least showdown value but with the most outs if we are going to continue the bluff on the river. Is there an exception here?
I plan to give up with my stronger bluffs and I'll bet the river with the weaker bluffs. I could just be bad at poker, but I currently hold the opinion that it doesn't matter if they fold a better hand. On the river, it's just a question of fold equity adding up to make a bet more profitable than checking. I'm not sure about this though so you can feel free to ignore my posts.

On a board pairing river, I'll probably give up with AJdd+, and AJcc+.
jeese posts a hand Quote
08-31-2014 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nchabazam
Just jam money in the pot. Tilt equity when you river a club is worth any price.
This guy will not flap.
jeese posts a hand Quote
08-31-2014 , 06:12 PM
i fold pf
you already know this but hj is peeling this flop 100% so be wary of how often you c/f turn
no one ever folds to that turn 3b anymore
jeese posts a hand Quote
08-31-2014 , 06:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bakku
i fold pf
you already know this but hj is peeling this flop 100% so be wary of how often you c/f turn
no one ever folds to that turn 3b anymore
Yeah yeah yeah.
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-03-2014 , 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bakku
i fold pf
you already know this but hj is peeling this flop 100% so be wary of how often you c/f turn
no one ever folds to that turn 3b anymore
Talked to a gto specialist. Live intuition tells me the 4 bet is weighted towards free showdown stuff (88/99 here). Game theory says 5 bet the turn. Discuss.
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-03-2014 , 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
Talked to a gto specialist. Live intuition tells me the 4 bet is weighted towards free showdown stuff (88/99 here). Game theory says 5 bet the turn. Discuss.
In order for 5 betting to be correct, it must be more profitable than calling and check raising the river when you hit.

I'm reminded of a passage from "The Theory of Poker" where he claims that it's never correct to just call when your semibluff gets raised, but I never agreed with that passage.

I call and hope to hit.
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-03-2014 , 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
Talked to a gto specialist. Live intuition tells me the 4 bet is weighted towards free showdown stuff (88/99 here). Game theory says 5 bet the turn. Discuss.
How is 4 betting the turn a free showdown?
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-03-2014 , 02:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob148
In order for 5 betting to be correct, it must be more profitable than calling and check raising the river when you hit.

I'm reminded of a passage from "The Theory of Poker" where he claims that it's never correct to just call when your semibluff gets raised, but I never agreed with that passage.

I call and hope to hit.
If it's a fsdr I never get to check raise river. Ever.
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-03-2014 , 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon_locke
How is 4 betting the turn a free showdown?
FSD4 obv. It's what self taught winning.players do here. Seriously. What hands is he four betting for value?
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-03-2014 , 03:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
FSD4 obv. It's what self taught winning.players do here. Seriously. What hands is he four betting for value?
KK+
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-04-2014 , 07:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon_locke
KK+
Well he had the snowmen
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-04-2014 , 10:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
Well he had the snowmen
Well, could he have had KK+?
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-05-2014 , 01:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by callipygian
Well, could he have had KK+?
I just don't think so. I feel like most tough but self taught players wait til the river there
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-05-2014 , 01:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
Well he had the snowmen
Super8888 IMO.
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-08-2014 , 11:17 PM
He's not folding a pair to a five bet
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-09-2014 , 03:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninefingershuffle
He's not folding a pair to a five bet
Will he really call a 5 bet and a river bet with 88/99?
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-09-2014 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888
Will he really call a 5 bet and a river bet with 88/99?
I think that's a necessary consequence of 4 betting turn (and another reason not to 4 bet).
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-10-2014 , 10:46 AM
Yeah I mean I didn't 5 bet. But I think it's worth considering.
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-10-2014 , 12:10 PM
If your read is that he never has KK+, then yeah, you're putting him on exactly 88-99 and 5-betting looks genius.

But KK+ is 24 combos so even discounted it's going to present problems. And I assume he's going to 6-bet 77 at least.
jeese posts a hand Quote
09-10-2014 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by callipygian
If your read is that he never has KK+, then yeah, you're putting him on exactly 88-99 and 5-betting looks genius.

But KK+ is 24 combos so even discounted it's going to present problems. And I assume he's going to 6-bet 77 at least.
No way he six bets less than 77 but yeah maybe.
jeese posts a hand Quote

      
m