Quote:
Originally Posted by DougL
This is the core of the argument, and may be strongly influenced by where/who you are playing. This summer, waiting for a NL seat I was sitting in a small spread limit game. A guy who after 45 minutes my "expert higher stakes player" read would have been this sort of nit, ran a 3 street bluff on a snug 50-something lady in the game. I kind of laughed inside as to a) how wrong my read was and b) how it seemed that he needed to push around the only female person in the game. Given longer in the game, it could be I'd have known my initial nit read was wrong or didn't apply in this exact spot due to male/female dynamics.
If the entire hand revolves around how well you know what you know, it is hard for a 3rd party not in the game to say. Maybe "I don't know" becomes the new "it depends"? The error bands on your reads have to overcome immense pot odds on later streets. An expert in the game can tell you if you're right or wrong... if only you know that the person was an expert instead of a fish on a heater.
I hear you.
To clarify: I was quoting a very specific flop comment from JMath,. He said that villian calling a raise on the flop means he
always has AK beat. This means that villian will always fold any pair of aces on the flop and never sees a turn in a raised flop unless he has 2pair+, well, you do the math.
I admit, it's remotely possible that this guy exists, who wins one out of every 20 sessions, repeatedly seeing how his mucked hand was the winner, keeps coming to play and never stops folding his aces, but I doubt it.