that's cool cause when more than final table other dynamics ususally take precedence. (2 shorthand 5 man tables, stealing, shorthand play, and still kinda far from payout).

OK, I think I fixed it (am know to have veen wrong in the past - see above )

It gets its own thread http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...88#post3125788

Normal 9-handed SnG. 50/30/20 payout.

Stacks:
10000
5000
5000

It only displays the bubble factors for stack 1. The 'X' are missing values.
-- 1.12 1.12
X ---- X
X X ---


If I change the stacks to 10000 5000 5001 I get the following:
-- 1.12 1.12
X ---- X
X 1.18 ----

Better but still missing values

Also with stacks 5000 5000 5000
It doesnt show any bubble factors at all.

it doesn't work three-handed (after the bubble) the way I've set it up. It would be pretty easy to fix though.


edit: rather it doesn't work when stacks = payout spots or less.
it works threehanded if you only have 2 spots (6max)

I dont really understand why you dont want it to work for 3-handed. But in case you change your mind or if someone else wants a working version. I just used the code for 6-handed and applied it to ITM for 9-handed and changed the payout structure.

I noticed that the 6max calculations takes (a lot) longer than the 9max. Is the algorithm for 9max code better or is it somehow more complicated math for the 6max? Seems strange to me, but I cant say I really understand the code

-----------------------------------------------------------
Change this part:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Loop, 6
{
GuiControlGet, Stack%A_Index%,, Stack%A_Index%
}

EVCALC()

-----------------------------------------------------------
To the following:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Loop, 6
{
GuiControlGet, Stack%A_Index%,, Stack%A_Index%
}


if ( (9max = 1) AND (Stack4 = 0) AND (Stack3 > 0) )
{
6max := 1
type = 6-max hand history
9max := 0
payf := 30
pays := 10
payt := 0
Checkstr = 6max
}

EVCALC()

-----------------------------------------------------------

Found why it takes longer... hehe there is a 'Sleep, 1' in the 6max code

I was wondering if it would be possible to make it work when there are only 3 players left. I would like to know my "bubble factor" (even though it's no longer the "bubble") for situations like this:

10000
3000
500

(Just the first example I thought of.)

I 'fixed' the code, but I cant update it on the page. If you want a working version before he fixes it just do the following.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Change this part:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Loop, 6
{
GuiControlGet, Stack%A_Index%,, Stack%A_Index%
}

EVCALC()

-----------------------------------------------------------
To the following:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Loop, 6
{
GuiControlGet, Stack%A_Index%,, Stack%A_Index%
}


if ( (9max = 1) AND (Stack4 = 0) AND (Stack3 > 0) )
{
6max := 1
type = 6-max hand history
9max := 0
payf := 30
pays := 10
payt := 0
Checkstr = 6max
}

EVCALC()

-----------------------------------------------------------

Ok, cool, thanks. Bubble Factors now displayed. The EV seems to be off. It adds up to 40 instead of 100. I don't really need the EV part, just curious if you're sure the Bubble Factors will be correct.

I'm getting a BF of 2.52 for the 3000 stack (against the 10000 stack) in my 10000, 3000, 500 example. Does that sound right?

Yes I am quite sure the Bubble Factors are correct. They look reasonable and match those for a modified 6max.

Sorry if you want the EV to show correctly modify the code to 75% first, 25% last.
(50 30 20 --> 30 10 0 once you are already ITM --> Which equals 75% 25% 0%)

Thanks for the improvements marand! I'll add and upload once I am done getting drunk.

Uploaded version 1.4 with marands improvements
http://overcards.com/wiki/moin.cgi/B...ctorCalculator

Well done, very useful.

Do you know how to calculate the average bubble factor when there are >2 tables left in a tournament? I would like to make bubble factor graphs like in the book for MTTs, but I can only do it up to 9 players using wiz.

I'm really sorry guys and I have been trying all morning but.....
I can't seem to get the script to do anything.
OK its true I've never used a script before so I'm probably being really thick here.
I've downloaded the AHK program and have pasted the bubble script into the edit script box but then when I exit the programme and re launch calculator doesn't appear anywhere...
OK I bet lots of you are peeing your pants now cos I've done or not done something really easy but please help if you can spare the time.

Download and doubleclick:
http://overcards.com/wiki/moin.cgi/B...et=BBFv1.4.ahk

Same that would be impresive, well i will pay for it, big prize! like 500$. More if he can take the chips of the player in our table other too via HH´s.

Hi,

Nice script for sure but I get this error when starting the script
All other scripts are working properly.

thx for your help

Did you use the link two posts up?
http://overcards.com/wiki/moin.cgi/B...et=BBFv1.4.ahk

yes, although I introduced a change of character while checking and testing the code.

Original grep functions by Titan reads :

(in case there is nothing btw the quotes sign, there should be a square character)

when the scripts runs with the orignal code as posted above the error says :

with a square character inside the quotes, which I can't reproduce here, but you see it in the Titan functions.

I guess the error occurs only on my system (weird, as it is a fairly standard XP PC); maybe I need a way to use grepcsv in the script instead of grep.

try

I get a varaition of the same error

1 quote, followed by no character (no comma)

I should add that I tried several things already :

- a space
- a dot
- other characters

bud it didn't help

also : another script (Stack Paster) using grepcsv and including but not using the grep part, does not show the problem once I commented out the grep part

could you give me a hint as to how I should approach things to rewrite it with grepcsv ?

maybe the expected output ?

Ok, I'm on my way to reprogram it without the grep; nice app