Thanks for sending.... I tested them and they worked fine.

Please forgive me, but, that pic looks like HM2? I'm using PT4.

I just tested with HM2, if i use PT3 or 4 settings in the converter and import to HM2 they are all labeled 6max. If i use HM1 or 2 settings they are all labeled HU.

Maybe i'll try to re-download the converter and uninstall, re-install?

Edit: Total uninstall with CCleaner, deleted install directory, re-install, still no change

Ok, silly... I missed that you were using PT4 even though you said it. I must have a reading problem. I'll check it again, and talk with the developer if there's an issue.

My HUSNG's are being documented in HM1 as 3man games. They also are listing random numbers in the rebuy column. It looks like this.

Haha, just to clarify, even when I tested with HM2 I did not achieve the results in your screen cap. Which seems odd.

Since the HU bug started, it always has labeled the entire table session as 2max in PT4. I have never seen it just separate hands played with only 2 players from other hands played with more than 2 players. Anytime a session gets to HU, the entire table session is labeled 2max.

I suppose if I am the only one having this issue, I guess i'll just have to deal. I just can't figure out what would be different on my end. PT4 and HM2 are both up to date as well as the converter. Anything else I should look at?

Couple mac questions:

Does bovada create a folder to save your hhs like on a pc, do I have to create one and save the files individually (takes forever)?

Anyone have any success using Pokeit? I'm trying to get my hhs (.txt files) synced with their application, emailed support.

Interesting... Can you PM me one of these Bovada hands (original unconverted)? I'd like to see what's going on and why HM1 is handling it different than hm2. Thanks.

What report are you looking at? I'm looking at winning summary.

My mistake. I am not familiar with HM. I just added the "tablesize" stat to the "By Stakes" report. Yes, in winning summary, it does separate the hands as shown in your screen cap. Phew, thank you.

The big question for me is how were the results for you when testing with PT4?

Np. Yeah, I tried PT4 and it looks like they are labeling them all as 2-max. No idea why, but PT is pretty weird about how it handles a lot of things. I'll have the developer look into it.

I see, thank you for your help.

They're saved inside the application file itself. Right click and "show package contents."

Just updated to .19g and there are hands in the 2max sessions that are not HU. I'm back to manually moving all HU games to 6max in Adjust Stakes. Also, wouldn't I rather one table session be marked as just that? I don't think I want sessions that went HU being marked as a different table session in PT4. I'd rather watch the session exactly as it unfolded. What happens when a third player sits? PT4 will add to the existing session before it went HU, or it will add a third session? Very confused.

It's tough because I have multiple people requesting multiple different options. Both make sense, except I think from a statistical perspective, which I think personally is a little more important, it makes more sense to separate these hands out. Having to review them in a separate session isn't ideal, but the more important fact is these aren't lumped into your 6-max or FR stats, which will drastically skew them. I'm going to talk to the developer about the viability of adding an option. But for now this seems to make the most sense.

There is a bug with PT4 as stated above though. I need to still look into this more. HM seems to handling them fine, PT4 is being a pain as usual.

I am having some issues running the trial version on Parallels using Windows XP. I keep getting a .NET Initializiation error (Unable to find runtime version). I have tried re-installing .NET but still getting the same issue. Any suggestions?

I agree about the stats, but imo it's much easier to make a filter for statistical purposes than to track what happened in a single session if they're forced apart. Sometimes I want to go through an entire session for training purposes, and especially due to the anon nature of the game, splitting it into a new session now makes it impossible to study the natural flow of a single session.

A software option would be great, but my vote is to keep the sessions together.

wtf is up with requesting HH's from bovada that never show up? this is starting to tilt me. I go thru the 24 hour waiting period and filter the date i want, click download, and it never shows up in the Hand History folder where it generally does. It's annoying because now I've prolly requested and never gotten hundreds of games because the consistency which with the HH's actually show up in the folder is spotty.

Anyone experience something similar?

Open the HH folder. Request hands. Quit client. Open client. Watch HH files populate. If not all of them downloaded, quit client again, open client.

This isn't my personal area of expertise. I know there are a few people that have posted in this thread that have got it running with that setup. I don't have any experience though, or a way to test give feedback. I'll see if I can contact someone who might know more.

I put this in the video, and it's probably becoming even more important. Request the hands from Bovada. Log out of Bovada. Give it a couple of minutes if you have a lot of hands before logging back in. If you have a small amount of sessions/hands, you can log right back in and out. I think they have to spool and get the hands ready, so allow some time when possible. When you log back in, check your HH folder for bovada. I always keep mine open on the side and make sure it looks like they are all there. I do this every couple of days and I get 100% of the hands no problem.

Hope that helps.

if i'm playing HU does the converter differentiate tables are exclusively HU vs just 2 players on a 6max table? I want to filter only heads up tables, and not include 6max tables with 2 players

Okay, please let me know. I've tried to reinstall .NET but still run into the same issue. Would love to buy a copy of the converter if I can get it to work. Thanks.

Two posts above yours was a discussion on this. Right now, the converter will label any hand that goes to 2 players as HU's, no matter what type of table it starts as.

I have both pt3 and hm1.. i do not plan on upgrading anytime soon. Does this converter work better with one of those?

It works with both fine, but with HM you'll be able to see all known hole cards. Poker tracker came to us and asked us to remove known hole cards, or they were blocking the software from importing. But they will both work and do the same, but it's a nice advantage to be able to see all of the cards at the table.