If you want to look at the play in terms of how well you're doing with a line then I suppose the benchmark should be the overall EV in case of GTO play. Having a smaller overall EV is not necessarily a problem. For example, if your range is weaker then you will be expected to get a smaller share of the pot. And similarly, the player who has in position usually has an advantage. The question is how you perform versus the situation where you would have played perfectly.

Hi. I have 2 license of CREV (main + second), if I upgrade for 50$ to GTO+ i will receive 2 license for GTO+?

Yes, all licenses in your account will be included with just a single upgrade.

Thank you! By the way great work from you and your team for years (i also bought Flopzilla and CREV). I was a little confused in a direct comparsion that are various differences between you two

I solved for multiple flops and see data like equity, EV, Bet %, and Check %. Is there a way I can copy and paste this data to an excel sheet?

There should be a text output option below the table.
See the screenshot below.

I can't import my ranges from Zilla/CREV over to GTO+ for some reason and followed the instructions given in a prior post. I put the newdefs2.txt file both in config and where the .exe file is and when i open GTO+ it says "failed to import" i also tried changing the name to newdefs3 and also no difference.

Thanks for any help!

Ok, can you mail your newdefs2.txt file to support?
I will convert it for you and send back a newdefs3.txt file.

Shipped it to ya! I'm always changing my ranges though, is there anyway I can convert it myself in the future so that I don't have to bother you in the future about it?

Alright issue fixed fellas in case anyone has the same problem of how to import flopzilla ranges to GTO+ Scylla said to go into your Flopzilla folder most likely under: C:/program files(x86)/Flopzilla then copy paste it into GTO+ folder

*Face palm* Can't believe I missed this.

I think I read this somewhere in this thread but adding or getting rid of a bet size on the turn or river forces you to solve the ENTIRE solution again correct? I'm watching some training videos and I see that the teacher is using simple postflop. He is able to add/subtract turn and river bet sizes without solving the flop all over again.

Thanks for all your hard work and quick responses, Scylla! Amazing product!

Yes, after editing a new tree is created, which does not yet contain a solution. We will expand the software in later releases though so that any flop solution that is present in the old tree will be copied to the newly created tree.

Is there a way to copy edited ranges from a dynamic popup on certain street in CREV?

No, GTO+ does offer text output though.
For that, click on the "text output button".

Anybody interested in putting together a Skype / Discord group to discuss how to best use GTO+ as well as some HH review and the like? PM me if interested.

Not a big deal but is there a way to change the order of the solved flops when I click "Tree?" I copied a list of 184 flops and solved them but whenever I tried to look for a specific flop, it's hard to find since the order is so jumbled. Of course, in the future, I'll set the order before solving for all the flops.

We will add more extensive sorting options for later releases, however, right at this moment, if you click on "Tree", the trees will be placed in the original order as they are in the database.

is it possible to output text for branches of the game tree past the first two initial actions by player 1 and 2? for example, i want to know player 1's check-raise frequency for a database i solved.

There's a few issues in displaying frequencies for spots later on in the tree. First of all, if player 2 has multiple bets after player 1 checks, then there's multiple decisions where player 1 gets to check-raise. So it's not a single spot for player 1, but multiple spots. Each spot would need to get its own separate table. Secondly, and more importantly, player 1 will have a different checking range for every flop. And similarly player 2 will have a different betting range after the check. Although it's possible to plot player 1's check-raising frequencies, the check-raise data for each flop is measured under completely different circumstances. As a consequence, this data isn't really suitable to be plotted in a graph/table. We can consider doing so anyhow for later releases, but right at this moment, we have left it out for this reason.

hi scylla, makes sense. i simplified my solves to only have 1 bet size and raise size so it shouldn't be an issue but i can see how having multiple bet and raise size would make it ineffective.

Is there anyway to get GTO+ to work on a Mac? I know that is possible with Flopzilla.

Yes, most people use CrossOver for this.

Thank you for fixing the no dunking issue and for making a commitment to letting us personalize and organize our databases in future versions.

I posed an issue in another forum about the difficulties of making flop exploits to adjust to turn imbalances, which is imprecise unless you can lock a strategy for all turns, or multiple turns at least. I had an idea that there could be an option for users to lock a turn strategy for one specific turn and then be able to apply that to all the turns we deem the strategy would remain the same. That would let us more accurately mimic a real opponent.

Another cool idea would be if I could apply a node lock to multiple trees. I'm just putting it out there. Much appreciated either way.

We can consider it, although with 49 different turns, each of which has a different effect on the structure of the board (some will pair it, some will create a 3flush, some will be an A overcard, etc) the strategy given for one particular turn card may not always be transferrable to a different turn card.

In CREV why is the EQ show in the tree different from the EQ shown in the equity distribution graph pop ups?