Quote:
Originally Posted by MLjung
Hi Gordon!
Your name seems to pop up here and there, and you seemed to be held in high regard.
I am currently a marginal winner at 25NL 6max zoom.
My goal is to move up, and if I could at one point make a living playing poker, then that would be a dream come true.
I try to play kind of a "math heavy" kind of poker (I think Janda is the nuts). I would summarize my strategy like this:
- I try to balance my ranges
- I try to "defend enough" when bet/raised into
- I want some sort of "out" when I bet (love them backdoors)
- Try to attack capped ranges
Now for my question: If I buy No BS 6max poker, will the advice in that book be (mostly) in line with my poker philosophy, or will it go (mostly) against it?
Basically, I am not to keen on doing to much stuff that works excellent at 25NL, but that I then have to unlearn at (lets say) 200NL.
HI MlJung,
bad news (because honesty is one of the core values here at BPC) :
What i teach is very likely against everything you believe.
It is not that i think GTO or balancing is "wrong" in an objective meaning. My core understanding on how poker works is 100% math based. I am NOT teaching feely fluffy bull****. I love evidence and results are my only metric of success (keeping variance in mind of course).
Having that said, what i teach is so ****ing effective and works very fast (work is of course required). I have replicated my method publicly with many different people who lived in different circumstances.
Why i think my method is superior:
Let me use an analogy and exaggerate a bit. To bang more chicks you could read a million hours worth of literature about evolutionary psychology, you could do research and create the most perfect system that exists in the world (on paper). You could perhaps create the perfect conversation that will make every girl dripping wet inside crying your name on her knees. Who knows... theoretically everything is possible...
However, you will likely have only moderate to no success in the present, but perhaps in 5 years you can dominate the world - IF your paper system happens to work. If not you have wasted all your time.
OR:
You look at the things that make 98% of success in no specific order of importance.
1) Work out. Looks matter (have no idea how much)
2) Find a project (aka, make money have a passion)
3) Do fun things, live a good life
(pls no highjack if u don't agree, i wanna stick to poker)
Master the few simple things that make the big difference. Once you have mastered them and move up to lets say NL400+, then it WILL be worth your time to mess with all the Math, GTO ranges etc.
Keep in mind, you never have to unlearn anything, because you never learn anything wrong. It's just that if you balance vs a fish who is a complete donk, you are loosing a TON of money by not adjusting.
My philosophy in short words: Do the most EFFECTIVE move in every situation
In other words, up to NL400, using GTO is an utter waste of time and actually TERRIBLE because there is a better alternative (not because it is terrible objectively). Also, how do you know if what you are thinking to be the GTO line is actually correct?!
What will happen if you do decide to do things differently:
You might explode right away, but more likely you will have a hard time changing your old way of thinking. That's just how things are.
You can stay part of the poker intellectual gang.
You will "KNOW" about every spot and what the best answer would be.
But there will always be those Gordon ******* students who make more money than you. Not because they are superior players (most likely inferior to yourself), but because they are superior MONEY MAKERS.
This is getting very long, but you ask a very important question. Feel free to go deeper because this is helping everybody to better understand poker.