chuck isn't definitely dead.
Quote:
Sepinwall: You killed a lot of notable characters in your Breaking Bad scripts, starting with the death of one of the Cousins in your first. Does this feel any different to you, in terms of the context of how Chuck is going?
Writer of the finale: Obviously, the ending’s a little ambiguous, but whatever happens, it’s obviously hugely impactful for Chuck. He’s a main character, he’s an actor I love, and it’s also a fairly intense emotional breakdown and scene. So this felt really significant. You want to do it right.
with that said, i do think he's dead, and i do think that's the right choice for the show. if he comes back i'd probably look past that though, because the actor and the character are just great.
the gale comparison is totally different. this is just after that episode ended:
Quote:
Sepinwall: We can talk about the future in a little bit, but right now I want to talk about that scene. You wrote it, you directed it, and it sounds to me like you don’t intend for there to be any ambiguity by the way you cut the final bit of it.
Gilligan: In my mind, no, I don’t intend for there to be any ambiguity. Let me start this by saying I always am reluctant to tell the audience afterward what to think or how to feel. I really prefer it when the audience comes to their own conclusions. But in honest answer to your question, I never really intended for there to be any ambiguity. But it’s funny: in the editing room, my editor and some other people were saying that the way it counter-dollies around, it looks like he’s changing his point of aim before he pulls the trigger. For what it’s worth, I did not intend for it to feel that way. I’ve been hearing from the people who’ve already seen it that it looks like he’s changing where he’s aiming. That is not intentional. I did not see it that way when I was directing. It’s not wrong for you to think he shot this guy.
only caveat i'd add to this is i'm not sure if gilligan or whoever has spoken since the above quote about chuck, but i don't think they have.
edit - michael mckean seems sure he's dead, but this is again from last june. i think in conclusion he's very very likely dead, though if this were a worse show you could see him surviving.
Quote:
Though the last scene was somewhat ambiguous — and though TV demises aren’t as conclusive as they used to be — the actor confirmed that what viewers saw was Chuck’s death.
“We’re saying that’s the end,” he said.
Mr. McKean called recently to discuss Chuck’s exit, his Mylar man cave and the joy of destruction. These are edited excerpts from the conversation.
Are we sure Chuck is definitely a goner?
I am. I know they want to bring me in for some flashbacks this coming season, but that’s kind of beside the point. One of the things that made Jimmy Saul Goodman is the burden of, if not guilt, then that nagging feeling of having being somehow involved [in Chuck’s demise]. So that’s what he has to deal with, and it’s one of the things that made him wind up in a Cinnabon in Omaha.
edit again - more from peter gould in june here,
http://deadline.com/2017/06/better-c...mc-1202116058/
Last edited by Yeti; 01-10-2018 at 11:51 PM.