A way too punish stars for rake changes
11-27-2014
, 01:04 PM
feel free to write a corrected version 
. i actually think it might work but in order to do so many people need to participate. if stars sees traffic going down a tone they have to react.
I mean you dont only need to beat regs you need to beat them by more than 5bb/100 as the rake is that high for zoom500.
so if you beat the rake against mostly regs by 5bb without rake you will be a loosing player taking rake into the calculation as well.
stars did a really goos job in creating and promoting a game that is only good for the house (now even at higher cost than befor).
in order to get at least the old circumstances back we need to stand together now.
. i actually think it might work but in order to do so many people need to participate. if stars sees traffic going down a tone they have to react.I mean you dont only need to beat regs you need to beat them by more than 5bb/100 as the rake is that high for zoom500.
so if you beat the rake against mostly regs by 5bb without rake you will be a loosing player taking rake into the calculation as well.
stars did a really goos job in creating and promoting a game that is only good for the house (now even at higher cost than befor).
in order to get at least the old circumstances back we need to stand together now.
11-27-2014
, 01:46 PM
11-27-2014
, 09:44 PM
11-30-2014
, 03:20 PM
Praios= Axel right?
Hard to sit out and seat script at Zoom
Lets give him a fair shot at a fun player in 25/50 50/100 zoom guys, it shouldn't have to be him and 13 other good players with multiple entries and 1 entry fun player not fair
BOYCOTT! RAKE!
Hard to sit out and seat script at Zoom
Lets give him a fair shot at a fun player in 25/50 50/100 zoom guys, it shouldn't have to be him and 13 other good players with multiple entries and 1 entry fun player
not fair BOYCOTT! RAKE!
