Quote:
Originally Posted by grizy
It's what I suspected. The calculation is incorrect. They did 2165.90/6.1. They should have done 2165.90/sqrt(6.1). Which gets you to 877/hr std. This is not exact since your sessions are presumably of different lengths but it gets us into the right ball park instead of what they have now.
That's still really really good relative to your winrate. Like I said, a ratio of std/winrate of hourly of 25 implies some pretty spectacular numbers for PLO. You're doing even better than that.
Haha. Total function of smallish sample and soft home game! I doubt those numbers could be sustained in a casino. Only problem with soft home games is sometimes you gotta wait a week (or three) to get paid. Conversely its a cashless game so if you lose you don't pay immediately.