Quote:
Originally Posted by sauce123
Raise is bad, it's implausible we check back the flop with 77 and not incredibly likely we jam for value with JJ
I think he meant to say the first raise was good instead of advocating a sick 4-bet bluff here, but I might be wrong.
Because nobody ever jams without the nuts here, if you think he'd 1) 3-bet for value with 88xx 2) realize that nobody ever jams without the nuts here, it would make this a pretty cool shove spot. Even if he'd discount quads because of the earlier line, he'd always expect to see JJ7x which makes perfect sense.
But yeah, I expect to see mostly JJxx which would just shrug-call the shove, so it's just a boring fold & save the moneys.
Last edited by Vanhaomena; 11-14-2011 at 08:10 AM.