Originally Posted by chinaski101
You do realise you're bad for stars right? You take money out of the game and stars give you a high % of rake back. The fact that shorties are making you win less is great for the poker ecology.
These arguments have been beaten to death-i wouldnt expect any changes.
ps. can people please stop starting fast tables.
I may be bad for the games indeed, but wouldnt any winning player be bad for the games?
I believe im one of the regs which contribute most to the mid stakes games tbh.
The best for stars/the games would obv be mass multitable breakeven players which just feeds rakes to stars.
My point is: when shortstacks are present at the tables it means that the mass multitable regs (20 tables+) with a +2bb/100 winrate (or whatever) will start playing less tables and start table selecting alot more and probably increase the winrate to +6bb/100 (or whatever) Now would that be good for stars? Would that be good for the games?