The game is an online 6-max home game where you only have 15 secs to make a decision. It is a 1/2 with a 4 utg straddle 200 min buy 1k max buy.

Villain 1 is a good aggressive player who plays 50/100+ and big live games.

Villain 2 is a bad player who chases too much.

Hero is viewed as a competent winning player who alternates between TAG and LAG, sometimes bluffy, sometimes trappy, occasionally goes brain dead and spews stacks.

Villain 1 : $2800
Villain 2: $415
Hero: $3300

Dealt to hero, AhAdKs2d


Villain 1 in MP raises to $7, CO calls, Hero raises to $31 on the button, SB calls villain 1 calls, CO folds.

Flop 3d7d8c


SB checks, Villain 1 bets pot $100, hero calls, SB raises pot to $340, Villain 1 calls, hero calls

Turn Kh


SB goes all-in for $75, Villain pots for $1300, hero?

$1300 to win ~$2400? Seems like a relatively easy fold. Not likely Villain 1 is doing this with a non-nut flush draw, I'd say he's much more likely to have a set or a two pair + wrap kinda hand. The only thing he has that makes you happy is Kxxx with two diamonds and even then, it's not super hard for him to have two purrs already. Just my take, I'm no pro though

Seems like a really odd spot. Either villain 1 is protecting presumably KK K8 or K7 or is just wanting to push you out of the pot. I feel like I'm folding because you're either flipping or in horrible shape. I do like the idea of calling and seeing some rivers but I think the problem is 80+% of the time he might just blow you off this hand anyway

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

We think that villain 1 is traping for not 3 beting the flop?

don't think villain 2 pots turn with 77 and probably doesn't have 88 given flop action

king really could have just smacked our kkxx, unless villain 2 has something like k77x specifically

villain 2 could have some sort of wrap + flush draw but if he plays like 60% of hands there are way way more 33xx, 77xx and 88xx than hands like 69t with diamonds, so that blocks some of villain 1's value as well

call and play rivers

raise flop

I think I would repot the flop after Villain 1 flats SB raise.

You are beat in at least 1 spot (probably a set) requiring an ace or a diamond to win.
Equity likely <20%. He may be isolating ?? ....

I would and have vomited in mouth, rinse, repeat, and fold.

Puke. I disagree with some of the previous posters a lot and think you're being shown a set a lot of the time when you slam in $1300 here. I think you just have to fold and not look at the river (like I see no reason for him to do this with JT98 and I don't expect a good player to jam that here).

How are we not shipping the flop after V1 just calls the raise?

Yea I posted the hand expecting people to rail on me for not shipping flop, and that it was a trivial decision.

I think in hindsight that is the correct play, at the time I was thinking Villain would likely check turns which would have given me initiative.

When he made the huge bet on the turn I was really confused whether he had tried to underrep his hand on the flop or if he was pushing me out.

as played fold. Should probably reraise flop though after v1 flats. If you're trapped with 77 or 88 then you're still in decent shape

Flop raise is pretty trivial. As played, given villain's flop line and the favorable turn, I don't think I'm folding.

I think after both yours and villains passive flop lines I'm leaning towards putting it in on the turn. Guess we're hoping for Kxxx diamonds but villain is pretty capped to hands worse than sets. Might have turned some 2 pair combo with Kxdd but that seems to be best case and we have a bunch of blockers.

I think I'm getting this in after villain 1 doesn't Rejam pot on flop which narrows his range. The fact he does it on turn tells me he wants other draws and better hands to fold. The K perhaps gives him two pair -the diamond draw also. I call


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ram and jam the flop