Quote:
Originally Posted by monikrazy
Xf is close to 100% guaranteed a better line than xr, I'm still not sure what best option is here though
Leaning
Xf > b/f > xc > bc
Based mostly on premise villain is checking back a very large portion of range, we realy only get exploited by worse flush draws and pair which is a small chance
Nice troll attempt.
Seriously though, if we're always cbetting strong hands/draws like this 100% of the time, aren't we pretty exploitable when we check, and especially when we x/c and the turn is a diamond? The opponent doesn't even need the Ad blocker to rep the nut flush effectively if it's never in our range to begin with.
Maybe from your experiences people don't exploit your checking ranges enough, but as a newer PLO player coming from a NL background I'm used to thinking about these things, and I'm a bit skeptical of the notion that seems to permeate the PLO community that it's always best to cbet the nut flush draw.
If solutions for Nash equilibria in NL tell us anything, it's that the EVs of checking and betting strong hands are most often very close (a huge surprise to everyone), and therefore mixed strategies are most often used with these hands. Granted this is PLO and not NL, but until we can actually get a sense of what a GTO solution looks like in this game I wouldn't automatically assume that the case is vastly different.
