Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Sports and Games > Sporting Events > Single-Team Season Threads

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-23-2009, 02:32 AM   #886
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
willie24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,873
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

Quote:
Originally Posted by SL__72 View Post
Because drafting TJ and signing Johnson/Holcumbe/Frerotte instead of someone decent are somewhat independent decisions.
huh? someone said that chilly handled the tj situation bad. then you said that tj was not a horrilble pick. chilly could have handled the tj situation bad and tj could have been an ok pick at the same time
willie24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 10:56 AM   #887
Modding All Day
 
Pudge714's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Frazier >>>>> Chilly
Posts: 38,636
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

willie,
I doubt the tjax haters think the problem is that he didn't get enough playing time.
Pudge714 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 11:06 AM   #888
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
SL__72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 15,691
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

Quote:
Originally Posted by willie24 View Post
huh? someone said that chilly handled the tj situation bad. then you said that tj was not a horrilble pick. chilly could have handled the tj situation bad and tj could have been an ok pick at the same time
Unless cha was talking about benching him at the beginning of last season (which I'm sure he wasn't) which I thought at the time and still think was a ridiculous and terrible decision, I don't know how Childress could have handled TJ differently?

He was an ok draft pick, it was fine to start him at the end of his rookie season when we sucked, it was fine to start him his 2nd season given the other options and it was certainly fine to start him over Frerotte last season.

Did you know that TJ's career (regular season) adjusted net yards per attempt was about the same as Eli Manning's before this season started? That by ANY/A, his 7 games or whatever last season were better on average then any season Eli has had? He has also only played in 28 games, less then two full seasons, including all the partial games he's gotten into. And Eli had Burress + a better OL.

That is an above average 64th overall pick.
SL__72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:03 PM   #889
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
willie24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,873
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

as you said, what was bad was not getting anyone better than TJ. to me, at least, that is totally tied to childress being stubborn about TJ being his guy. if you wanted to describe that blunder in two words i think it'd be fair to say "tj".

there is nothing implied there that tj was a bad draft pick.

Last edited by willie24; 10-23-2009 at 12:04 PM. Reason: i use "tj" exclusively because i refuse to acknowledge the use of "tjax" and don't know how to spell tarvarus
willie24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:14 PM   #890
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
willie24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,873
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

Quote:
Originally Posted by SL__72 View Post
Unless cha was talking about benching him at the beginning of last season (which I'm sure he wasn't) which I thought at the time and still think was a ridiculous and terrible decision, I don't know how Childress could have handled TJ differently?
he could have had a plan B.
willie24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 03:06 PM   #891
ARTist
 
cha59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: I like meat.
Posts: 15,339
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

Quote:
Originally Posted by willie24 View Post
he could have had a plan B.
This.

The fact that chilly traded up for him, seemed to make chilly think he was going to be a lot better than he is. The fact that chilly has never had a good plan B is why it was a bad pick.

As far as what I think of TJ, I have exaggerated a lot about my dislike for him before, but I do not think he should be plan A, and never should have been plan A. He is a project, with limited upside.
cha59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 05:32 PM   #892
Pooh-Bah
 
vikefan24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 3,660
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

Quote:
Originally Posted by willie24 View Post
as you said, what was bad was not getting anyone better than TJ. to me, at least, that is totally tied to childress being stubborn about TJ being his guy. if you wanted to describe that blunder in two words i think it'd be fair to say "tj".

there is nothing implied there that tj was a bad draft pick.
This is exactly what I meant when I quoted that guys list of Chili problems and just added the Tarvaris comment
vikefan24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 12:46 AM   #893
ARTist
 
cha59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: I like meat.
Posts: 15,339
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

Not much being said here about the game tomorrow.

Is Pittsburgh going to exploit our D after seeing what Baltimore did last week, or are we going to actually tackle people this week?

I wonder if we get blown out, if the Chilly contract extension talk will go away for a while.

I think we have a decent chance to win this game, but its something <50%.
cha59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 11:39 AM   #894
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
vetiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,701
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

Quote:
Originally Posted by cha59 View Post
Not much being said here about the game tomorrow.

Is Pittsburgh going to exploit our D after seeing what Baltimore did last week, or are we going to actually tackle people this week?

I wonder if we get blown out, if the Chilly contract extension talk will go away for a while.

I think we have a decent chance to win this game, but its something <50%.
vegas says 27%

winfield out 4-6 weeks
vetiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 11:49 AM   #895
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
SMIGLET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CUTLUH CUTLUH CUTLUH CUTLUH CUTLUH
Posts: 14,621
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

roethlesberger will get his yards, he will also get sacked a ton. chalk up another 2+ sacks for jared

kind of hard to say how the vikings offense will do, favre has to have a bad game soon right?
SMIGLET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 12:17 PM   #896
Modding All Day
 
Pudge714's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Frazier >>>>> Chilly
Posts: 38,636
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

about Winfield.
After steelers/packers we have Bye and Detroit so let's hope he can be back at full strength for Seattle/Chicago
Pudge714 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 12:50 PM   #897
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
SarcasticRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sucking at Reverse Sheep
Posts: 7,951
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

I have a weird feeling the game is going to be a shootout. I know Roethlisberger is going to throw for like 500 yards, have a feeling the Vikings offense is going to mostly keep pace and we'll probably lose on a Childress coaching fail.
SarcasticRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 01:27 PM   #898
formerly TheProdigy
 
Schwallie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,192
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

WTF IS UP WITH THIS PUNTING? SERIOUSLY?

44-36-12 YRDS without any pressure
Schwallie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 01:59 PM   #899
veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: St. Paul
Posts: 2,298
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

vikings looking better this drive but all these short passes worry me. could see one being jumped for 6 the other way.
McShove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 02:36 PM   #900
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
willie24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,873
Re: Vikings 2009 Thread Fire Chilly

god that's a tough last 2nd quarter drive. 2 missed tackles on m. moore in the backfield on 3rd down, e.j. dropped interception, johnson had a (tougher) chance at an interception.
willie24 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive