NFL Fantasy Football 2016 Dynasty League $100 - Page 4 - Fantasy Sports -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Two Plus Two Forums Sports and Games Fantasy Sports

NFL Fantasy Football 2016 Dynasty League $100

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 4 of 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Page 4 of 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

01-11-2016 , 05:39 PM

#76

NDfan

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 10,016

Quote:

Originally Posted by gs3737

Anyone prefer a 14 team league if there is enough interest??

Im ok with that.

Quote

01-11-2016 , 06:11 PM

#77

rafiki

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 40,015

Don't think I'll make this one guys, just not enough time in a day. I'll come chirp the second best dynasty league on here when I can!

Quote

01-11-2016 , 06:18 PM

#78

BluffMyNuts

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 13,211

Booooooooooooooooooooo

Quote

01-11-2016 , 06:38 PM

#79

danvh

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 9,528

Quote

01-11-2016 , 10:14 PM

#80

Toerazor

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,954

We can do a 14 team league if people want. We are at 12 right now if all of the maybes end up getting in the league.

Also I would rather do no kickers and no defense. But we can decide that later if people want.

Quote

01-11-2016 , 10:23 PM

#81

NDfan

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 10,016

Ya, I would prefer to keep defense, but its not a sticking point and Ill go with the majority.

Quote

01-11-2016 , 10:41 PM

#82

BluffMyNuts

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 13,211

Would prefer
No lolkicker
No defense
Cool on 12 or 14

Quote

01-12-2016 , 08:02 AM

#83

waterwolves

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 11,557

I'd prefer no kickers but I'd rather keep defenses. 12-14 teams is fine I would just like to mention that if we go no kickers and 14 teams with the same roster sizes as the other league we're looking at 54 less players on the WW. So essentially the WW will be dead. Just something to keep in mind.

Quote

01-12-2016 , 09:34 AM

#84

gs3737

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,497

I'm good with kickers or no kickers, defense or no defense, but gotta stay with what we decide for good.

Quote

01-12-2016 , 10:44 AM

#85

Weeniehutgeneral

journeyman

Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 264

Yea, I figured if we removed def and kickers we would have to shrink roster size a bit

Quote

01-12-2016 , 10:02 PM

#86

bthekuta

adept

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 702

14 is ideal since in a 13 week regular season, you play every other team exactly once.

No kickers, no defense.

Quote

01-13-2016 , 12:39 AM

#87

Toerazor

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,954

If we do no kickers and no defense. Should we reduce the rosters to 18 instead of 20? Or we could leave it at 20 and add another Flex spot.

Quote

01-13-2016 , 12:59 AM

#88

Toerazor

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,954

So we are at 11 right now since rafiki is out. We can wait and see if we can get 14 since people see ok with that.

Quote

01-13-2016 , 01:06 AM

#89

Toerazor

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,954

So if we dont have kickers or defense I am thinking of this as a starting roster

1- Quarterback
2- Running Backs
3- Wide Receivers
1- Tight End
2- Flex positions (TE/WR/RB)

We could have 20 roster spots total with 1 IR spot. What do you guys think about this?

Quote

01-13-2016 , 01:53 AM

#90

BluffMyNuts

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 13,211

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toerazor

I would prefer

1-QB
2-RB
3-WR
1-TE
1-Flex
18-Roster spots
2-IR spots

Quote

01-13-2016 , 01:57 AM

#91

danvh

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 9,528

As long as I can use the Power of Christ to compel my players to victory, I am good with whateva

Quote

01-13-2016 , 08:00 AM

#92

NDfan

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 10,016

Quote:

Originally Posted by BluffMyNuts

I would prefer

1-QB
2-RB
3-WR
1-TE
1-Flex
18-Roster spots
2-IR spots

Agree

Quote

01-13-2016 , 08:05 AM

#93

waterwolves

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 11,557

Quote:

Originally Posted by BluffMyNuts

I would prefer

1-QB
2-RB
3-WR
1-TE
1-Flex
18-Roster spots
2-IR spots

I'm ok with anything really but this looks good.

Quote

01-13-2016 , 08:08 AM

#94

Weeniehutgeneral

journeyman

Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 264

I prefer this too

Quote

01-13-2016 , 10:30 AM

#95

danvh

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 9,528

Btw, maybe we should edit the Thread Name to have (3 spots still left) or something

Quote

01-13-2016 , 11:19 AM

#96

Toerazor

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,954

Quote:

Originally Posted by BluffMyNuts

I would prefer

1-QB
2-RB
3-WR
1-TE
1-Flex
18-Roster spots
2-IR spots

OK everyone seems to like this instead so we will do this roster.

Quote

01-15-2016 , 06:16 PM

#97

Toerazor

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,954

How do I add that there are 3 spots open in the post title?

Quote

01-15-2016 , 06:23 PM

#98

waterwolves

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 11,557

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toerazor

How do I add that there are 3 spots open in the post title?

PM a mod and they'll change it for you.

Quote

01-17-2016 , 04:35 PM

#99

waterwolves

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 11,557

So what's going on in here? We need one more owner for a 12 team league or 3 more for a 14 team league? Would love to be slow drafting this league in a month.