Quote:
Originally Posted by DontDoItPls
The max years is in place since there is no escalating cost. I think it has to be one or the other, not both. Personally I prefer escalating costs as it avoids all of the hypothetical situations that arise with max years.
-DontDoItPls
yeah ok, i agree it would help solve some of the problems being brought up...
we could have another vote:
1. keepers are 3 year max- same round draft pick cost (no change if traded, keeper doesnt reset)
2. no max years on keepers, 1st year=same round taken, 2nd year -1 spot and so fourth....
ie 7th round pick in first year =u lose 7th round pick, in second year if u kept same player he would be worth a 6th round pick...
*if u kept a first round player, the second year he would automatically go back into draft pool
** FA would still=8th round in both scenarios...
also we are using reg waivers, it won 7-5...