1st round RB (got unlucky last night)
solid #2 WR
potential PPR beast when he returns

vs

Rookie
Solid 2nd year WR (probably a 6th rounder)
RBBC RB on bust team. (also injured)

Seems pretty fair. You're the only one who's pissed. Getting the better end of a trade is one of the funnest parts of fantasy football. You're just jealous. Commish shouldn't even acknowledge your bitching and moaning.

That's not this. Not even close. I played with this guy last year in multiple leagues. He's never blown up his team.

Usually I think downgrading at every position is a bad trade but maybe I'm wrong. You're right Lewis will be good when he comes back in 5 weeks.

Injured RB1
ww trash
Injured RB3/4

For

RB1 stud
#3 WR in standard leagues. Looks to be the real deal.
Injured RB2/3 (worth more than Lewis imo)

=

Collusion

yeah that's not even close

Standard league, neeeed a receiver.

Guys offering me travis benjamin or willie snead for crowell.

Another member is potentially offering Bmarshall and Sanu for Crowell, Lockett and JBrown.

Snap accept the 2nd offer if it happens right? And if it doesnt who should i pick from the first offer?

You guys are idiots. I stand by my commish.

Elliot fumbled twice and is in danger of Morris taking over.
Rawls is injured too and is being outplayed by Michael.
Diggs is over performing.

AP is a no question, upper tier, stud #1 RB (DOESN'T MATTER HE'S INJURED AFTER TRADE MORAN)
Wheaton is not WR trash (maybe 2 years ago). Wheaton is basically Diggs. OMG 2 WEEKS IN DIGGS IS THE BEST WR EVARRR!!! Wheaton went well ahead of Diggs in most drafts.
Dion Lewis is Danny Woodhead when he comes back (PPR league)

I would favor the Diggs/Rawls/Elliot party slightly but calling this collusion makes you a grade A ****ing ******.

If this trade happened before ADP got hurt, I would be okay with it.

I still like the Elliot side because Diggs looked very good last night, but before last night, I think it would have been fine. When I commented, I thought it was offered after the game.

I just made a trade where I gave up 114 pts Season to date for 13 pts season to date.

Gave up WR #11 and #16 season to date & RB #11 season to date to get back RB # 44 season to date.

Ok thanks for the update

Bump, both deals are happening and could use some help on the decision.

I like the 2nd one a lot more. Just make sure if Marshall's knee going to be an issue, before you accept.

Ok thanks, yea thats my only hesitation but I think its too good of an offer to refuse

Yeah even with the uncertainty around BMarsh right now, 2nd offer is worth the risk.

To be fair the trade occurred before AP got hurt this week. But while he was still over the age of 30

Calling it collusion just because it's uneven is certainly dumb, but your justifications and insistence on it being a remotely even trade (yes, even before the injury/Diggs explosion) are just as absurd.

Wheaton and Lewis are on the waiver wire in most leagues, and rightfully so. Plenty of people had Elliot ahead of or just about even with AP before the season, and Elliot has had 2 solid if unspectacular games, while AP had 1 terrible one at the time of the trade.

Also Wheaton was drafted around 2 rounds later than Diggs on average (according to FantasyPros), and even further apart by people who knew what they were doing, so no clue where you got that info, but it makes your justification seem pretty lol when you are just making stuff up.

You trade raped a guy...nbd, just accept it. The trade being uneven doesn't make it collusion, and even if the trade was as close as you contend, it could still be collusion. Your argument here makes no sense.

I am close to closing this deal, do you think I am giving up too much?

My roster:
Bortles
Lamar Miller/DeAngelo/Spencer Ware/L. Murray/J. Hill/J. Langford
Hopkins/Cooper/Cooks/K.Benjamin
Witten
Janikowski

Dont ask how I got these players, its a 12 player league and the other drafters werent very competent.

So my idea is to upgrade at QB, TE and K, am I giving up too much though...?

Bortles/DeAngelo/K.Benjamin/Witten/Janikowski

for

Drew Brees/Greg Olsen/Gostkowski

What do you guys think? Should I also be willing to do the trade without the lol-kicker swap?

Does anyone else think this is true?

Yes. Yes.

Assuming you can't start all 4 of those WR's it seems good for you, not giving up too much. And yeah, kickers being involved shouldn't matter at all.

Of course not. Just another lol in a post full of lol.

Never once implied it was even. I'm just playing devil's advocate for the other side to show that crying collusion is beyond ******ed and that person needs to stfu and worry about his own team.

This is a terrible trade for you.

+100

You're basically giving up Benjamin and DeAngelo for Greg Olsen. Beyond bad.

So two bench players for a big starter upgrade is beyond bad? Also Brees=Bortles?