Quote:
Originally Posted by StoppedRainingMen
your first pick shouldn't be a gamble. if you're taking anyone over trout you're taking bro and even that's wrong. trout just had his worst season yet and goldschmidt just had his best season and the difference wasn't really that big. plus trout is 4 years younger. trout's floor is basically comparable to goldschmidt's ceiling unless you believe he's magically going 40/40
5. arenado 8. bryant and 12. e5 are just laughably bad
13. gordon and 14. pollock are just as bad and even worse that both are taken while STANTON is still on the board
i love madbum but him being the 3rd pitcher off the board is propostrous
dickerson and heyward are steals in the 6th assuming dickerson isn't the OF that gets dealt from colorado
edit: ya this dr. roto guy who had the first pick has ****ing garbage for a team
Not necessarily what I would do, but I dont think Arenado at 5 is crazy at all. I have him neck and neck with Donaldson. What does your top ~20 look like?
And while I wouldnt take Bryant top 10, there are certainly arguments to be made for him. Especially in NFBC type leagues where there is no waiver wire and no trading. You have to be much more aggressive early in drafts than in a normal league.
E5 over Stanton is a head scratcher, but assuming Stanton is gone I could understand someone wanting Encarnacion in the #12-14 range.
Pollock is a bit of a gamble but 20/20 players are becoming more and more rare. And he has actually been great for 2 years now, just 2014 was injury shortened so nobody noticed - if he continues that hes a top 12 hitter.
I will never understand the guys who take Dee Gordon that early. Seems like a huge mistake to me. I dont get it.