Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Pricing is always soft for the majors. I think it's considered good for casuals; that's the market niche DK is trying to market DFS PGA to during the majors. It gives casual players a chance to roster a lot of top players they know and want to root for during the tournament without much research or headaches.
Isn't it just more a case of having a deeper field? More top players at the majors means that the distribution of talent across the whole player pool is higher. There's a fairly standard deviation of player salaries in each event, so an event with more top players is going to flatten out that distribution. So as the previous poster mentioned Charl Schwartzel is $7600 in an event that features 50 of the top 50 golfers in the world, whereas he might be something like $9000 in an event that only features 25-30 or the top 50 golfers in the world.
Those middle tier players (Schwartzel, JB Holmes, Snedecker, etc.) who are usually in the 8500-9000 range in a standard PGA tour event are going to get knocked down the ladder a bit to the mid 7000s in events with more top players. It does have the added benefit of bringing more casual players into the field, because they can build full teams of 6 guys they've heard of, but I don't know that it's intentionally cooked by DK for that reason, more just a function of the deeper field.
Doesn't matter to me either way, it's not going to change my own methodology for building lineups, and if it brings in more casual players and juice the prize pools, then great!