$0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 5 Players
Poker Tools Powered By
Holdem Manager - The Ultimate
Poker Software Suite.
SB: $34.98 (35 bb)
BB: $100 (100 bb)
MP: $226.78 (226.8 bb)
CO: $100 (100 bb)
Hero (BTN): $337.67 (337.7 bb)
Preflop: Hero is BTN with Q
4
2 folds,
Hero raises to $2,
SB folds, BB calls $1
Flop: ($4.50) T
A
3
(2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks
Turn: ($4.50) 6
(2 players)
BB bets $3, Hero calls $3
River: ($10.50) T
(2 players)
BB bets $7,
Hero raises to $21.25,
BB raises to $95 and is all-in,
Hero folds
Hi,
In the above spot ive got a question about the river 3bet by villain.
I give him 33(3), 66(3), AT(6) = 12 combos of value here.
Hes giving me 1,7:1 so in order to be balanced here he would need to have 3 bluffcombos.
Anyways depending on the history and action at the current table that might be alot more or alot less (I understand that this isnt the best hand example for that since river 3bet at smallstakes are only nuts most of the time) but since he should bluff only 3 combos in order to be balanced then does this method work to find spots where people potentially overbluff or underbluff ?
Or does this work only OTR since there is no more street left ?
For example: If I do the same math OTT then I guess the outcome would be flawed according to my applied logic here since there is one more street left ?
I hope I could express myself clear b/c english isnt my first language.