Open Side Menu Go to the Top
FAQ Today's Posts Search Twitter Discord
Register
Should there be a difference between betsizing for small vs high stakes Should there be a difference between betsizing for small vs high stakes
Post Reply Subscribe
...
02-18-2016 , 05:26 AM
#1
b e t
View Profile Find Posts By b e t Find Threads By b e t
stranger
Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 9
In a $100 game where the pot is $12 on the flop and the cbet is $6 often posters will say bet more on the flop, but if you watch high stakes players many of them have a default cbet of 1/3 or 1/2. Should there be a difference between betsizing for small vs high stakes?
Should there be a difference between betsizing for small vs high stakes Quote
02-18-2016 , 12:38 PM
#2
just_grindin
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By just_grindin Find Threads By just_grindin
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 5,263
Yes. Your competition is typically completely different at small stakes compared to high stakes.
Should there be a difference between betsizing for small vs high stakes Quote
02-18-2016 , 12:45 PM
#3
b e t
View Profile Find Posts By b e t Find Threads By b e t
stranger
Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 9
Should you be cbetting bigger or smaller at smaller stakes if your balancing your value bets and bluffs?
Should there be a difference between betsizing for small vs high stakes Quote
02-18-2016 , 02:09 PM
#4
RustyBrooks's Avatar
RustyBrooks
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By RustyBrooks Find Threads By RustyBrooks
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 24,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by b e t
Should you be cbetting bigger or smaller at smaller stakes if your balancing your value bets and bluffs?
The reason to change betting sizes, or frequencies, or your ranges, etc, etc, has the most to do with how your competition responds to your actions.

So it's not an inherent function of stakes. If I play *you* HU, then my frequencies should be the same at .01/.02, 1/2 or 100/200. But if I play a typical .01/.02 player they should be different than the typical 100/200 player.

Different how? I couldn't tell you - I don't play HU at 100/200 or .01/.02.
Should there be a difference between betsizing for small vs high stakes Quote
02-18-2016 , 03:24 PM
#5
BigFredy007
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By BigFredy007 Find Threads By BigFredy007
journeyman
Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 240
Quote:
Originally Posted by b e t
In a $100 game where the pot is $12 on the flop and the cbet is $6 often posters will say bet more on the flop, but if you watch high stakes players many of them have a default cbet of 1/3 or 1/2. Should there be a difference between betsizing for small vs high stakes?
When u face stronger opponent u want to adjust you bet sizes to the betting ranges u want to use. Vs weaker players u can easily split u sizing regarding your hand and for example, bet big for value and bluff small (or bet small for thin value)..
Should there be a difference between betsizing for small vs high stakes Quote
02-18-2016 , 09:39 PM
#6
StraightFlooosh's Avatar
StraightFlooosh
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By StraightFlooosh Find Threads By StraightFlooosh
adept
Join Date: May 2015 Posts: 761
Speculation so I'm probably wrong but the propensity to valuebet extremely thin is more common at highstakes. Wouldn't this lend itself to smaller sizing in many situations, as it gives a better price to call with marginal holdings.

I want to be clear that my theory might be utter nonsense,
Should there be a difference between betsizing for small vs high stakes Quote
Post Reply Subscribe
...
      
Feedback is used for internal purposes. LEARN MORE
Contact Us Privacy Statement TOS
Top
Powered by:  Hand2Note
Copyright ©2008-2022, Hand2Note Interactive LTD
m