Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Perfect Question The Perfect Question

06-26-2017 , 09:15 AM
I am curious to know whether anybody understands all the fundamentals of exploitative theory. And so I have devised a question which will let me know... Can any of you answer this:

What type of move are you incapable of making if you are incapable of the FOURTH Level of thought?

(If you've read a pre-release version of my book please don't answer!)
06-26-2017 , 09:25 AM
My levels are maybe different. Can you spot me a definition of 4th level, since mine is different?

EDIT: oh, Sklansky/Miller levels. Got it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Last edited by robert_utk; 06-26-2017 at 09:31 AM.
06-26-2017 , 09:34 AM
You can't make a he knows that I know that he knows that I know that he knows that I know that he knows that I know what he has raise.

Last edited by Bladesman87; 06-26-2017 at 09:35 AM. Reason: underdetermined questions are of little interest
06-26-2017 , 09:38 AM
Well, you can not break a level three tie. IE, all information you can process about the first three levels does not cross your decision threshold and you are unable to be more precise. You would have to flip a coin (or use flop hash) to make a decision.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-26-2017 , 09:43 AM
Yeah this article gives you an almost perfect overview of the levels...

https://www.pokernews.com/strategy/m...oker-19458.htm

In it there is a fundamentally misunderstanding which leads to a few mistakes. For example, it says that Level Five is for elite thinkers, it says that players who are capable of this Level live on a different plane of existence to everyone else. But this is completely wrong, it's easy to think at Level Five.
06-26-2017 , 09:44 AM
Quote:
Well, you can not break a level three tie. IE, all information you can process about the first three levels does not cross your decision threshold and you are unable to be more precise. You would have to flip a coin (or use flop hash) to make a decision.
Fair point, semantically. To expand on why the question is underdetermined: it is unclear what a "move" even is. If it means legal plays then all options are open to a player regardless of what "level" (also undefined from the OP's perspective) they're thinking on. There is never a legal "move" I can't make. There are only different reasons as to why. And it's not even necessary that a player has a well formed "reason". Bots aren't consciously reasoning but they can play poker.
06-26-2017 , 09:47 AM
It is clearly a specific type of move. Its pretty simple and is something you will have all heard of, but I don't want to give it away! The person who understands all the fundamentals of exploitative theory will be able to answer it easily.
06-26-2017 , 09:47 AM
Is there such a thing as an exploit bot, from theory perspective?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-26-2017 , 09:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yadoula8
It is clearly a specific type of move. Its pretty simple and is something you will have all heard of, but I don't want to give it away!
Triple range merge?
06-26-2017 , 09:50 AM
I have never heard of a triple range merge lol
06-26-2017 , 09:50 AM
Value bluff. Play your bluff range, but sized as value bet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-26-2017 , 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yadoula8
I have never heard of a triple range merge lol
And this guy thinks he understands exploitation?

Tell me what you mean by "move", please.
06-26-2017 , 10:17 AM
If I think that you're thinking that I'm thinking of etc....is kind of assigning hand ranges to your opponent drawn out from a psychological battle that has been narrowed down.

You can value bluff because it would be part of a range that your opponent has narrowed down for you. You couldn't over bet a bluff because it would become obvious that it is not inside of the perceived hand ranges. You certainly would not get a call anyway.
06-26-2017 , 10:32 AM
Another way to say it, would be "what works against level 3" with +EV that is statistically actionable. IE, risk/reward. So, how can I get him to play musical chairs, when I am sitting in the chair the whole time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-26-2017 , 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by robert_utk
Another way to say it, would be "what works against level 3" with +EV that is statistically actionable. IE, risk/reward. So, how can I get him to play musical chairs, when I am sitting in the chair the whole time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
By convincing him you are taking a nap and not in the chair
06-26-2017 , 11:06 AM
I just looked up the term triple range merge and that is wrong... Value bluffing is another term I have not heard of, and again it is incorrect

What do I mean by move... I'm looking for a general sentence which describes all the plays that we can make once reaching Level Four. If you knew exploitative theory you'd know exactly what I'm talking about... Let me make it a little easier for you. Finish this sentence:

If I was incapable of the fourth Level of thought I would not be able to .........................
06-26-2017 , 11:11 AM
Call a bet with +EV from a level 3 player. The sentence can be completed by simple semantics.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-26-2017 , 11:15 AM
Well that is cheating, but it's wrong too... A GTO player could make a play that was +EV against that dude without any understanding of any exploitative Level.
06-26-2017 , 11:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yadoula8
Well that is cheating, but it's wrong too... A GTO player could make a play that was +EV against that dude without any understanding of any exploitative Level.

Pffft! No GTO here!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-26-2017 , 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yadoula8
Well that is cheating, but it's wrong too... A GTO player could make a play that was +EV against that dude without any understanding of any exploitative Level.


Infinite deal same situation over and over, you can not extract EV from lvl 3 without lvl 4.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-26-2017 , 11:21 AM
The point of levels is to exploit other levels. GTO is a cop out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-26-2017 , 11:22 AM
So what play is immune to GTO and is lvl 4?

lel


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-26-2017 , 11:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by robert_utk
Pffft! No GTO here!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol GTO is the devil!!... (I think I can get away with that here)... I personally believe that trusting in GTO plays stops you working out the answers to questions like this. It will be awesome if a beginner cracks this before a reg comes forward. I expect it will be easier for you beginners so don't be dismayed by all these complicated answers. The real answer is pretty simple.

Last edited by Yadoula8; 06-26-2017 at 11:38 AM.
06-26-2017 , 11:25 AM
If your solution is firmly based in GTO or even close to Nash, so help me


...triggering intensifies....

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-26-2017 , 11:30 AM
The answer has nothing to do with GTO

      
m