Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05
Are you saying that vs. your 3bets your opponents, in the aggregate, have: (i) called 10% to 35% of the time, (ii) 4bet 30% to 50% of the time and (iii) folded 35% to 40% of the time?
It is a pretty big range between some of those numbers. Have they called 10% of the time or 35% of the time? Big difference.
And a 4bet percentage of 30% to 50% is crazy high (even at the low end).
Anyway, my 3bet range is elastic and is very dependent on the specific opponent.
If, in a certain position dynamic, a specific opponent opens pre-flop 30% of the time and when facing a 3bet (i) called 15% of the time, (ii) 4bet 50% of the time and (iii) folded 35% of the time, I would probably just about never 3bet him light with a hand that I would fold to a 4bet. But I would 3bet him lighter and 5bet shove lighter than I would other people. Mid pocket pairs become easy 3bet/5bet shoves. AQ. AJ. I haven't done the math, but I'm guessing any A may show a profit assuming normalish sizings and that he isn't calling the 5bet shove too much more often than other people (I may just throw in some smaller suited A's).
50% is a ridiculous 4bet percentage unless his pre-flop raise percentage is super tiny (like less than 5%). And if his pre-flop raise is that super tiny, then don't 3bet him without a top premium.
They fold around 40%. The 60% where they do not fold , they 4bet often (like 40-50%) ; rest are calls. so for every call they do, i also get a 4bet(roughly) . Well , i take care of the different OR-Ranges and i also think that they should not be able to 4bet this crazy, seems like everyone is tilting or something lol.
should i just nit up and 3bet bigger?
and do you guys like to play in games where preflop foldequity is very low ?