Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
a home game payout dilemma a home game payout dilemma

08-20-2014 , 07:03 PM
25 chips $25 buyin, every chip is $1 dollar. Usually 7 to 10 people, once it gets to top 3 people cash in their chips for $1 each. Please convince these two guys that this is a cash game. There is no bubble factor, play for chip ev.

They are set in stone this is a tournament
a home game payout dilemma Quote
08-20-2014 , 07:38 PM
ftp had something similar, dunno if it's still there, called a cash-out tournament. although i think cashing out was optional and there were still payouts for the people who wanted to keep playing.

anyway it seems like your only question is whether your format should be called a cash game or a tournament. a) it's kind of a mix of both, b) this doesn't have anything to do with poker theory, and c) who really cares?
a home game payout dilemma Quote
08-20-2014 , 08:13 PM
This is definitely more of a tournament than a cash game. The only thing about it resembling a cash game is the fact that $1 in chips is equal to $1 in real money.

What if your friends changed the chip stack to $50 and made every $2 in chips = exactly $1?

If i remember correctly, this is precisely how Stars fifty fifty tournaments worked though I never played them. They were like dons except the payouts were relative to your final stack.

Similarly, if you played a HU match for cash with the rule that you can't cash out until there is one player left I would call this a HUSNG. Wouldn't you?
a home game payout dilemma Quote
08-20-2014 , 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LazyAce
if you played a HU match for cash with the rule that you can't cash out until there is one player left I would call this a HUSNG. Wouldn't you?
If you also couldn't top of your stack when it got low then yeah I agree, even if the blinds don't increase. Being forced to play with a short stack makes it a sng.
a home game payout dilemma Quote
08-20-2014 , 11:03 PM
There is a bubble factor no? 4th place gets nothing, 3th can cash out so 4th place is bubble. It all sounds like a tournament to me.
a home game payout dilemma Quote
08-21-2014 , 01:08 AM
It's called a freeze out which a cross between a cash game and tournament. i.e. no reloading or cashing out (before the end) but no blind levels or payout schedule either.

Definitely should play like a cash game. e.g. No point in surviving to third if you only have $1 where as in a tournament, 1 chip would still get bottom money.

Theoretically equivalent to a winner take all event which should also play like a cash game because it's all the chips for all the cash.

Another words, there's no difference between CEV and $EV in your game.
a home game payout dilemma Quote
08-21-2014 , 01:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 50 pence
There is a bubble factor no? 4th place gets nothing, 3th can cash out so 4th place is bubble. It all sounds like a tournament to me.
You can call it a bubble but it shouldn't have any bearing on your play. You shouldn't be passing on +EV spots just to try and survive which is the typical situation with a tournament that has a payout schedule.
a home game payout dilemma Quote
08-21-2014 , 01:31 AM
I should add that there are freeze-out tournaments with payout schedules.

you can also call a cash game a freeze-out and pay cash value for chips.

Technically speaking the term freeze-out just means no reloading.
a home game payout dilemma Quote
08-21-2014 , 02:05 AM
What you want to call it doesn't matter. In terms of how you should play, you should play hands exactly as you would in an equivalent cash game.
a home game payout dilemma Quote
08-21-2014 , 10:52 AM
Ty guys this is all I needed. I was trying to tell them it's a cash game. I agree it has a tourney structure and I'm not even sure the guys arguing knew what we were arguing about. my main point was there is no incentive in getting 3rd, our only goal is to maximize are chip expectation every hand, which is not the case in tournaments.
a home game payout dilemma Quote

      
m