50nl BBJ is so hard to beat rake

Makes sense, I didn't think of it like that. I agree then, probably best to keep it 100NL or higher.

BBJ should only be for 200nl and higher anyways. The rake is way too much and I refuse to play those tables

This, please. Got knocked out of a Private tourney and found out I couldn't rail my cohorts. That's the biggest reason we play, to talk trash.

This is the worst suggestion itt. No one wants these bbj tables

Thanks, try reading a few posts up where I agreed that it wasn't a good idea.

I agree 50NL should have a BBJ, but that should be the lowest level that has one.

SNG Step Tournaments for cash or WSOP seats

Accolades List

do you actually understand how much it costs you?

Those HU super turbo SNGs are absurd. FTP tried 10bb starting stacks before everyone realized there's not enough edge & bitched enough at FTP to change the structure to 25bb starting stacks. They also lowered rake. Use the past to not make the same mistakes.

The merge HU STs start w/ 15bb & charge an absurd amount of rake. $55+$2.50 vs $100+$2 on FTP, which has a slower structure that allows more edge. The faster structure & the less edge there is, the lower the rake should be. It should be something like $55+$1 AT THE VERY MOST. You could even argue rake as low as $55+$0.60 for how fast that structure is.

I'd recommend implementing a structure like FTP has. The big sites like FTP & Stars are a blueprint for you. I just can't believe how smaller sites don't copy what works for the bigger sites more often.

Thanks

Yes would really like to have this.

St with same structure as ftp would be great. No way 5% rake is beatable with the current structure

I'm a fixed limit guy... I do see your point though, may as well just keep it at 100NL.

Just played my first cash game session on the site. I really don't like the All-In button. Clicked it once by accident preflop. Is this common? I don't see why I can't just use the scroller when I want to go all-in. Hopefully it doesn't happen as I get used to the software.

Get rid of all in button ...go to settings.

I sent Carbon Support a couple of e-mails 20 hours ago, asking them to confirm that I was setup properly to receive Rakeback plus a larger signup bonus than the 100% up to $600 (my RB site said we could get up to $2000), and I still have not received a reply. I'm not going to deposit until I get confirmation. Seems odd to make a potential customer wait so long.

Carbon questions in the RPM forum? Head explode!

Yup, did it. Thanks for the PM. My suggestion would be to make the default to hide the All-In button.

At FT, I could just stand up at a cash table and then switch seats at the same table. Could we get the same feature, please?

I think they stopped reading this thread . It stays up as a placebo sugar pill to make us think our suggestions matter

PokerStars used to allow you to see who was sitting out at a tournament table, which helps a lot when you are multi-tabling. It would be great if RPM could institute this feature.

For tournaments you should make the structure such that none of the payouts are below the buy in

100% agree

It would be nice if you guys could post at least a week's worth of tourneys in the lobby, so that we can compare them all and plan on which we'd like to play. For example, I see there's a $11 WSOP satellite, which awards a $60 ticket, but I have no idea what tourney the $60 is for. I also see there's a $60 WSOP satellite which awards a $460 ticket. lol, I guess the $11 feeds into the $60. so when's the $460, and how many seats does it award?