Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Sports and Games > Chess and Other Board Games

Notices

Chess and Other Board Games Discussion of chess and other board game strategy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2011, 03:04 AM   #946
2011 2+2 Chess Champion
 
smilingbill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: dragging a hippo from a marsh
Posts: 1,460
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

Looks drawn to me; for the win Black would need to be able to a) block out this bishop from g2 by getting a king to f2 and a knight to f3 which doesnt seem realistic from here or b) have the White pawn blocked all the way back to something like b2 or b3 so that Black can mate with K+2N after winning the bishop c) knight fork

In a practical game it would be worth playing on if just for the knight fork factor
smilingbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 03:12 AM   #947
old hand
 
KyleJRM82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,544
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

The 45 45 pool at ICC has been getting on my nerves lately. No strong opponents and loads of wait for a game, so I took a shot at the 15 0 tournaments that have been running all game. That feels like bullet to a guy like me, so the time control has been challenging. I was kind of a good test of my instincts/general ideas.

Here was an interesting game with a fella who is Class A over in Europe and has a site about some kind of prop bet to make GM someday.

Gave him some fits for awhile, but fell victim to the bad player's worst enemy in these positions. "I'll just simplify down and hope for the best." No! Simplifying against stronger opponents just makes it that much less likely for them to make the mistake you need to win.


http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game...r.php?id=39440

PGN in spoiler tags

Spoiler:
KyleJRM82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 02:23 PM   #948
journeyman
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 237
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

I wouldn't blame that game on trading pieces but on hanging your pawns and some bad moves that made them hard to defend. So, tactics really. When I saw you picking up your a pawn I was hoping it would go to a3 rather than a4. Then your knight got very scared.
Allen C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 02:41 PM   #949
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
ganstaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: central nj
Posts: 7,704
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

In general though, I think it is correct to leave more pieces on against a stronger player in hopes of creating a confusing position where they can make just 1 mistake to hand you the game. Otherwise, I agree with Allen about this game.

One other thing I would have considered is 12. f3 instead of 12. h3. It probably doesn't matter much, but both keep an eye on the g4 square. 12. h3 can in some positions open you up to sacrifices like ...Bxh3, which you'd want to avoid. 12. f3 has the added benefit of supporting the e4 pawn so it won't become a liability or tie your pieces down.

After writing this, I went to the chess engine just to see. It does actually suggest 12. f3 (at least if I wait less than a minute) with lines including Rf1-f2-d2. I hadn't thought of it, but opening up for a rook lift is indeed another benefit of 12. f3 over 12. h3.
ganstaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 03:32 PM   #950
2011 2+2 Chess Champion
 
smilingbill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: dragging a hippo from a marsh
Posts: 1,460
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

24.a4 b4 could maybe followed by 25.Nd5!? or (?!) creating some confusion I'd also try very hard to make 27.Nc4 work with the idea of 27.-Bxc5 28.Nd6 but not sure if it works.

edit: or 25.Nb5

Last edited by smilingbill; 01-09-2011 at 03:43 PM.
smilingbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 03:39 PM   #951
old hand
 
KyleJRM82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,544
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen C View Post
I wouldn't blame that game on trading pieces but on hanging your pawns and some bad moves that made them hard to defend. So, tactics really. When I saw you picking up your a pawn I was hoping it would go to a3 rather than a4. Then your knight got very scared.
Pawn moves kill me a lot. I like to think it's because I've spent a lot of time studying tactics, which mostly focus on pieces, so that's what's left for me to make a mistake with.

a3 looks obvious now that you mention it. I'll try to see it next time. After the game, my opponent said "if you didn't have that weak c-pawn I don't think I would have won." That should have been more of my focus.
KyleJRM82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 03:42 PM   #952
old hand
 
KyleJRM82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,544
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

Quote:
Originally Posted by smilingbill View Post
24.a4 b4 could maybe followed by 25.Nd5!? or (?!) creating some confusion I'd also try very hard to make 27.Nc4 work with the idea of 27.-Bxc5 28.Nd6 but not sure if it works.
It felt like Nc4 dropped the c-pawn. I might be wrong on that.
KyleJRM82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 03:47 PM   #953
2011 2+2 Chess Champion
 
smilingbill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: dragging a hippo from a marsh
Posts: 1,460
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

27.Nd6 doesn't seem to work but Firebird says you are much better after 27.Bg4. Even afterwards you seem to have been fine until you blundered with 33.f4?, by logically continuing the knight tour with 33.Ng4 you'd still be equal. 27.Bc4 was fine also but you unnecessarily released tension with 28.Bxe6+ (just like in the opening with dxe5)
smilingbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 04:05 PM   #954
old hand
 
KyleJRM82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,544
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

Quote:
Originally Posted by smilingbill View Post
27.Nd6 doesn't seem to work but Firebird says you are much better after 27.Bg4. Even afterwards you seem to have been fine until you blundered with 33.f4?, by logically continuing the knight tour with 33.Ng4 you'd still be equal. 27.Bc4 was fine also but you unnecessarily released tension with 28.Bxe6+ (just like in the opening with dxe5)
Yeah, 33. f4 was just a pure, stone-cold tactical mistake. Born out of two things: 1) Not enough tactics training (never enough!) and 2) Just not having any clue as to how to proceed in the position, which is the pure, sweet primordial ooze from which tactical blunders evolve. Especially in time trouble.
KyleJRM82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 04:25 PM   #955
veteran
 
Noir_Desir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: qui
Posts: 2,262
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

One thing i've noticed is that you seem to define things a bit early sometimes. There's a saying "tension benefits the side that can relieve it more easily". A good example is opposing rooks on an open file. If you control the square on the file and your backrank, but the opponent doesn't control his, you can exchange rooks and oppose with the other one, while he can't do the same. In this case usually don't exchange.
I refer to the Bxg6 move in your QGD game where you exchange your bishop for a knight that won't run away anyways. Let him think about these tensions and try to improve your position in other ways, before finding a more suitable moment for the exchange. Getting more comfortable with tensions on the board is also a major milestone for chess improvement.

Also, be glad that strong players point out your mistakes here, but don't feel the need to explain them. Mistakes are made in chess, we all know that .
Noir_Desir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 04:31 PM   #956
old hand
 
KyleJRM82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,544
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

Thanks as always! My mistakes are the only thing I have insight on. Without explaining them, I'd have nothing to post
KyleJRM82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 01:53 AM   #957
old hand
 
KyleJRM82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,544
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

Let's try this one without comments from me first and see what people think:

http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game...r.php?id=39521


[Event "ICC"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2011.01.13"]
[White "jechess"]
[Black "KyleMayhugh"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1677"]
[BlackElo "1609"]
[ECO "C65"]
[Opening "Ruy Lopez"]
[Variation "Berlin defense, Beverwijk variation"]
[TimeControl "2700+45"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. c3 O-O
6. d4 exd4 7. cxd4 Bb4 8. a3 Ba5 9. b4 Bb6 10. e5 Nd5
11. Bc4 Nde7 12. Re1 d5 13. Bb3 Bf5 14. h3 a5 15. b5 Na7
16. a4 c6 17. Nc3 cxb5 18. axb5 Rc8 19. Bb2 Qd7 20. Ba4 f6
21. exf6 Rxf6 22. Rc1 Rcf8 23. Ba3 Nac8 24. Ne5 Qe8 25. Bb3 Be6
26. f3 Bc7 27. Nxd5 Nxd5 28. Bxf8 Rxf8 29. Bxd5 Bxd5 30. Rxc7 Qxb5
31. Qc1 Nb6 32. Qc5 Qxc5 33. Rxc5 a4 34. Rb1 Rf6 35. Rcb5 Nc4
36. Rxd5 Nxe5 37. dxe5 Ra6 38. Rd8+ Kf7 39. Rd7+ Ke6 40. Rdxb7 a3
41. Ra1 Kxe5 42. Rxg7 Kd4 43. Rxh7 Kc3 44. Rb7 Ra4 45. g4 Rb4
46. Rxb4 Kxb4 47. Rxa3 Kxa3
1-0
KyleJRM82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 02:40 AM   #958
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
ganstaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: central nj
Posts: 7,704
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

Some really quick thoughts (so likely all wrong...):
-Something seems wrong in that opening for black. I wonder if white could have played 6. Bxc6 and 7. Nxe5 successfully.
-Why 13...Bf5 instead of 13...Bg4? I believe the latter wins the important d4-pawn, and if not, it should still be at least an annoying pin.
-I'm seeing 22. Rxe7 Qxe7 23. Nxd5, and the fork wins back the exchange, which should leave white up a pawn.
-22...Rcf8 seems wrong given the pin it allows and black's pieces seem all overloaded. Maybe 22...Rd8 instead? Still lets the knight out and adds protection on the d-file.
-I wanted to try 35...a3. It should be better than losing a piece at least.
ganstaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 05:36 AM   #959
grinder
 
Ajezz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 614
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

In the opening, you should strongly consider 4..Nxe4. After all, this is the whole point of playing 3..Nf6. After e.g. 5. d4 Nd6 6. Bxc6 dxc6 7. dxe5 Nf5 8. Qxd8+ Kxd8 you have reached the starting point of the Berlin endgame which is a respectable line for Black.

I saw in the database that 6..exd4 is basically never played (and therefore most probably bad), I guess because you just give up the centre without a fight. Just 6..Bb6. The pawn exchange is also bad because it gives White the extra option of playing e5 sometime. Without the exchange, e4 is still hanging.

Instead of 10..Nd5, an option is to play 10..Ne4 with 11..d5.

I hate 11..Nde7. You have to keep your position in the centre. If he had played 12. d5 you are toast. Just play 11. Nce7.
Ajezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 05:18 PM   #960
old hand
 
KyleJRM82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,544
Re: *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

Thanks guys! Those suggestions make a lot of sense.
KyleJRM82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive