Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** Chess BBV *** *** Chess BBV ***

01-13-2012 , 01:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobJoeJim
It was specifically after I had castled queenside that I got super-paranoid about doubling those pawns. I don't know if this is good/reasonable justification, or if there's a flaw in the thinking?
I'd be happy for someone stronger than I to weigh in on that question, to be honest. As White I'd try to prevent it, but as Black I probably wouldn't play it. I'm not sure the pawns are that easy to attack and Black may miss that bishop...

Quote:
And yes, 29. e5 was the computer's recommendation, which I still have a devil of a time understanding. "Why would I possibly want to give away a free pawn?" asks the patzer. When I do a serious computer analysis, I'll have to look closely at the 29. e5 lines and try to reach an understanding of that move.
The main goal is just to open a way to attack g6 for the bishop -- Black's kingside pawns are hard for him to defend (he can't use his bishop, and his king is far away). With your pawn on e4, your bishop is also pretty limited in scope, and it's likely that things get completely locked up for the draw.

And that pawn's not free -- if 29.e5 Bxe5 is probably a mistake as after 30.Kf2, Black can't stop you from winning the g6 and h5 pawns. I think that Black plays 29...Bg3 instead, to trade off all of the kingside pawns, but now 30.Bxh5 or 30.Kf4 both look like candidates, but that's too tough for me to figure out without moving the pieces around. But only White can win that.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-13-2012 , 01:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayo
OK. This is the highest rated person I've beaten so far:


[Event "Live Chess"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2012.01.12"]
[White "Le_roi"]
[Black "dcmayo"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "1216"]
[BlackElo "984"]
[TimeControl "15|10"]
[Termination "dcmayo won by resignation"]

1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e3 Be6 4.Nc3 Nf6 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.Be2 Qd6 7.O-O O-O-O 8.Nb5 Qd5 9.Nc3 Qa5 10.Ng5 Nd5 11.Bd2 Nxc3 12.Bxc3 Qxg5 13.Qa4 Bd5 14.g3 Qf5 15.Bxc4 Be4 16.Be2 Qh3 17.f3 Qh5 18.g4 Qg6 19.fxe4 Qxe4 20.Bf3 Qxe3+ 21.Kg2 Nxd4 22.Qxa7 Nc2 23.Rad1 Qxa7 0-1



I think I did OK. He gave me plenty to work with, and I think I capitalized pretty well.
It's nice to post a link to a replayer, too...

3...Be6 seems weird, blocking in the B@f8. But I can't see a way to punish is that much...5.e4 but c6 seems OK. Hmm. I'll have to look that up. But 7.e4 works; e5 and d5 both threats.

10.Ng5 just hangs the knight, but luckily he didn't play 11.Nxe6, so you were able to get it the second time.

14...Qf5 is not great; better to get some more pieces into the attack, maybe e5 or h5.

I like that you played 15...Be4 instead of trading bishops -- lots of people tend to trade pieces too much when they're ahead instead of playing for mate. (But still, get more pieces into the attack!)

17.Qh5 was a little too fancy and he punished you for it.

22.Nc2 is a move to be proud of...a true swindle. Actually, 21...Nxd4 is no good because of 22.Qxa7--that knight's the only thing keeping your king safe. In the game, White can just play 23.Qxb7+ instead of dropping the queen!

Good game though.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-13-2012 , 01:42 AM
Oh, just realized I'm spamming the BBV thread with analysis. Oops.

Brag: Outplayed some master for 30 moves.
Beat: Still lost when I blundered in time pressure.
Variance: None. I'm making a bad habit of this...
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-13-2012 , 04:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobJoeJim
I think at move 7 I would have been perfectly happy to double the pawns if it meant getting the bishop pair, and then I'd just castle kingside. It was specifically after I had castled queenside that I got super-paranoid about doubling those pawns. I don't know if this is good/reasonable justification, or if there's a flaw in the thinking?
Well, in general it's a good idea to keep your pawns intact but here the bishop pair is probably more important. Having the king over to potentially protect the doubled pawns is just a good thing in this case since there is no real danger of an attack on the king. I would have played 9.Bf4.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobJoeJim
Yeah, in the game I thought e5 was where he went wrong, but that cursory computer glance I mentioned didn't have a problem with it. And yes, 29. e5 was the computer's recommendation, which I still have a devil of a time understanding. "Why would I possibly want to give away a free pawn?" asks the patzer. When I do a serious computer analysis, I'll have to look closely at the 29. e5 lines and try to reach an understanding of that move.!
29.e5 just makes sure the B has access to g6 before Black gets to blockade it out.

Black actually played the middlegame quite well before ruining it with 26.-Rf2? and 27.-Rh2?, the rook was very nicely placed on f4. He could start by improving the K a little with Kc7, then consider his options re: penetrating the queenside with the king.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-15-2012 , 01:58 AM
Brag: My USCF rating is up to a new personal best of 1938 after the tournament earlier this evening. Went 3/4 with wins over a 1473, 1810, and 2150. The loss came at the hands of a 2610 GM so I don't feel too terrible

Variance: The 2150 is an 11 year old boy that had a score of 5-0 against me before tonight.

Beat: Sadly thrilled to finally be on the scoreboard against an 11 year old
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-15-2012 , 02:15 AM
Nice result!
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-15-2012 , 11:23 AM
Great job, Tex! The short break did you some good.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-15-2012 , 11:38 AM
Thank y'all, much appreciated Yep, a short break every once in a while to clear the mind really works. It's like your brain needs some time to sort things out.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-15-2012 , 11:42 AM
Tex, congrats. Keep up the good work!

Fwiw, age doesn't matter (that much) in chess.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-16-2012 , 12:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexAg06
The loss came at the hands of a 2610 GM so I don't feel too terrible
But why did you wuss out and play the under 2700 section rather than the open section?
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-16-2012 , 12:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen C
But why did you wuss out and play the under 2700 section rather than the open section?
It's not too often that I actually laugh out loud at the internet. gg sir.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-16-2012 , 12:16 PM
wrong thread, nm
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-16-2012 , 08:41 PM
I can't wait to play a live event, bink it, get interviewed and asked who my favorite poker player is!

Spoiler:
Allen C


TexAg I also had a good laugh
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-20-2012 , 11:27 PM
Beat: Awful play by me tonight at the chess club. 0/2 including blundering while up a piece against an NM and then just playing like garbage against a 1900. Not really worried about the loss of rating points, because those quickly come and go, but I'm frustrated at myself for playing so poorly tonight. Horrendous.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-23-2012 , 10:38 PM
man I just won on time on a 5/0 game where my oponent has 30 seconds left and I had 3. Im the GOAT premover, this year I have 13 wins on time and only 3 losses.

I made an expert check sacrifice at the end to win it.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-25-2012 , 10:02 AM
I lose too many won positions by just doing stupid stuff
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-25-2012 , 04:25 PM
brag: My U1800 team won their division in the T4545 tournament (t51)

I was board 6 though and only played 4 regular season games - I was almost called up for a playoff game but the higher ranked boards took precedence

still two more free months of ICC aint nothing to snarl at

rb
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
01-26-2012 , 04:04 AM
Congrats whiskeytown!
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
02-02-2012 , 04:35 PM
Beat: My computer froze and disconnected me right as I was reaching for the resign button in a lost position, so now I look like one of those "you beat me so I'll just ragequit and force you to wait for adjudication" jerkoffs.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
02-02-2012 , 05:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KyleJRM82
Brag: My computer froze and disconnected me right as I was reaching for the resign button in a lost position, so now I look like one of those "you beat me so I'll just ragequit and force you to wait for adjudication" jerkoffs.
fyp
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
02-03-2012 , 12:02 AM
You can always resign the stored game...
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
02-05-2012 , 06:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by g-bebe
fyp
Took me way too long to determine what you fixed.

make fixes Bold in the future.

nh tho
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
02-05-2012 , 07:45 AM


White to move and win (this is from a 3-minute blitz game on FICS)
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
02-05-2012 , 10:06 AM
Spoiler:
Bf8
*** Chess BBV *** Quote
02-05-2012 , 12:39 PM
Spoiler:
That was always the nice thing about starting out playing the dragon (as Black) -- lots of tactics, but not as many motifs, so Bf8 is very thematic here; the threat is Rxh8+. But I actually am not sure what the right followup is here:
1.Bf8 Nh5 2.Rxh5 gxh5 and with the threats of Rxc3 an just Kxf8...what's the finish?
-2.gxh5 looks winning, though, I'm curious whether there's something better I'm missing.
*** Chess BBV *** Quote

      
m