Quote:
Originally Posted by BobJoeJim
Nepo did formally protest to the appeals committee. They ruled that Nakamura did violate the rules by castling with two hands and that he "clearly touched the rook before the king" so if Nepo had objected at the time it happened an arbiter could have compelled Naka to move the rook rather than castling.
However Nepo ignored it when it happened, and so runs afoul of a different rule which reads "A player forfeits his right to a claim against his opponent’s violation of Article 4 once he deliberately touches a piece", and so the committee both issued a warning to Nakamura and also rejected Nepomniachtchi's appeal.
http://www.bakuworldcup2015.com/news/8/141
I think these are both true but predictably miss the important point Nepomniatchi raised:
Quote:
Article 12: The role of the Arbiter (see Preface)
12.1
The arbiter shall see that the Laws of Chess are strictly observed.
It's a mistake by the arbiter not to intervene here. An understandable mistake, given that it requires looking at the replay to be certain - but the appeals committee should still at least acknowledge the mistake instead of whitewashing it.
It would have been appalling if Nepomniatchi had objected to the arbiter and the arbiter had only then intervened. Either the arbiter saw it was incorrect, and should have unilaterally intervened, or he did not see it, and would have rejected Nepomniatchi's complaint. Video footage is not foreseen in the FIDE rules but I believe the arbiter is not expected to avail himself of it.
Either way, it's another victory for Nakamura and his utter lack of class.