I look at it this way. After 8/4*, what do you risk more by hitting second checker with an ace? Not much. You're only screwed after the 54 double hit. Opp's 5s were quite good already (anchoring up) after the single hit. And the gains? Over the roof. Take note that if opp hits one of your checkers, he often dances with his other guy, and you have plenty of cover or attack rolls (even if he doesn't dance and enter both, you can still continue the attack). That's already OK. Now look what happens if he doesn't hit at all (16/36 chance). Over the roof.
Factors like:
- you outboard your opponent
- after double loose hit you reopen the priming plan (very improbable before the roll), slotting all important gaps
- opp has a dynamic frontal structure (may improve quickly given full rolls to play)
...raise the urgency and value of an attack even farther, but are not decisive ones.
The double hit is so strong that it's quite hard to find a variant where it's not the top choice. Take a look at bunch I've examined (eval by XGR++):
Opp doesn't have additional blots exposed.
8/4* 6/5* is still better than
8/4* 4/3 by
.139
Opp doesn't have add. blots, plus we don't outboard him anymore. Also, his board/prime is quite strong, so getting hit is more risky.
8/4* 6/5* is still better than
8/4* 4/3 by
.136
We are given a very constructive ace on the other side of the board, anchoring up against an already strong blockade.
8/4* 6/5* is still better than
22/21 8/4* by
.113
Packing up opp's frontal structure with builders greatly raises the urgency to anchor up. Even in this situation...
8/4* 6/5* is not worse than
22/21 8/4* (they are +/-
.001)