Who's giving these guys the idea that this fake bones thing is actually
a valid argument?

Sigh.

Nah, you won't get me into a "discussion" about which insane claim is to be taken seriously.

You're just another false prophet.

The evidence for macro evolution is overwhelming.

Here are some facts:

Whales have tiny bones that serve no purpose in the rear of the animal that are vestigial leg bones. This supports that the whale evolved from a landwalking mammal.

Humans have one less chromosome than chimps and one of the human chromosomes has telomeres ("caps") in the middle. On each side of the middle, the genetic material is very similar to two separate chimp chromosomes. The best explanation is a genetic mutation in chimps cause two of their chromosomes to fuse.

Fossils fully support macro evolution. One evolutionist predicted a fish/reptile transition fossil was in existence and found it in Canada (Tiktalik).

Morality evolved just like every other aspect of humans. Human groups who worked together and were nice to each other had a higher chance of survival.

Tiktaalik and whale "leg" bones evidence is far from overwhelming.

Standard creationist response:

I'll buy the first Darwinist creationist to admit that they are such a beer.

festeringZit, where do you stand on Archaeopteryx? Evidence of a missing link or something else?

I await with bated breathe.