Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Other Topics > Religion, God, and Theology

Notices

Religion, God, and Theology Discussion of God, religion, faith, theology, and spirituality.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-2012, 05:37 PM   #31
Pooh-Bah
 
Wizard-50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 5,170
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

Alter2ego I don't have the time and energy to get into this, but from the bits I read, I think your understanding of trinity theology has been poorly explained to you or misunderstood by you.
Wizard-50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 06:21 PM   #32
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 380
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokerlogist View Post
This should be unnecessary to present:

1 John 5:7-8
Young's Literal Translation (YLT)
7because three are who are testifying [in the heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these -- the three -- are one; 8and three are who are testifying in the earth], the Spirit, and the water, and the blood, and the three are into the one.
ALTER2EGO:

1 John 5:7--known as the Johannine Comma aka the Comma Johanneum--is completely fabricated. For that reason, many of the modern Bibles have removed it from their translations.

"For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one." (1 John 5:7)

Those extra words are absent from the Greek manuscripts and only appeared in the text of four manuscripts during the late medieval period (the Middle Ages). Since the KJV was translated in A.D. 1611, many Biblical manuscripts have been discovered that are older and more accurate than the manuscripts the KJV was based on. Those older manuscripts do not contain the fabricated words found at 1 John 5:7. That's what I was referring to when I mentioned "older Bible manuscripts."


Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokerlogist View Post
Also the term "godhead" is used in the Bible more than once.
ALTER2EGO:

The word GODHEAD is a fabricated word that did not appear in the original writings of the Bible. The last book of the Bible was completed in 41 AD. That is, in the first century AD. The word GODHEDE appeared for the first time in a 14th Century AD English translation of the Bible--1,300 years after the fact. The translator who introduced the word GODHEDE was named John Wycleffe. He was a Catholic Priest. He belonged to the very same religion responsible for the Trinity dogma. By the time the King James Version was released in 1611, the word GODHEDE had been changed to GODHEAD.

Last edited by Alter2Ego; 03-26-2012 at 06:29 PM.
Alter2Ego is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 07:25 PM   #33
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 380
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kb coolman View Post
The 'Firstborn of all Creation' argument is a strictly JW teaching, meant to justify their own teachings. 'Firstborn of all Creation' is a position of authority, nothing more. The Firstborn is the son who recieves the full inheritance from the Father. While it typically was the first born son, that was not a requirement of the position. If the first born was unworthy, or died, then the second born inherited the title of Firstborn.

To say Jesus is the Firstborn over all Creation is a statement of his authority, not his birth right.

And the Bible very clearly teaches that the Godhead is three persons in unity.
ALTER2EGO -to- KB COOLMAN:

"He is the image of the invisible God, the FIRSTBORN of all CREATION;.." (Colossians 1:15 -- New World Translation)

That verse of scripture is in other English translations of the Judeo-Christian Bible. In other words, the words are genuine. You can dance around trying to explain away the meaning of "firstborn of ALL CREATION" until kingdom come. Nothing you say will change the meaning of the words "all creation"--which refer to EVERYTHING and EVERYONE that was created. In other words, the pre-human Jesus was created.

Below are several renditions of the same verse in other English translations. These are just a few of the many other Bibles that I can produce—and they all say the same thing.



VARIOUS TRANSLATIONS OF COLOSSIANS 1:15

International Standard Version
"The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation."

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
"He who is the image of The Unseen God and is The Firstborn of all creation."

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
"Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:"

New International Version
"He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation."

English Standard Version
"He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation."

New American Standard Bible
"He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation."



Now let's hear your interpretation of the terminology in the scripture below. Keep your eyes on the words in all caps and bold.

"So the Word became flesh and resided among us, and we had a view of his glory, a glory such as belongs to an ONLY-BEGOTTEN SON from a father; and he was full of undeserved kindness and truth." (John 1:14)

The words "firstborn" and "begotten" apply to CREATED BEINGS according to any English dictionary.



DEFINITION OF "BORN": "Born means having been given life."
http://www.yourdictionary.com/born


DEFINITON OF "BEGOTTEN": "Begotten means something created something else or someone fathered a child."
http://www.yourdictionary.com/begotten
Alter2Ego is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 08:46 PM   #34
True Facts
 
asdfasdf32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dexter's table
Posts: 8,901
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

I love the fact that Alter2Ego isn't willing to trust the findings of scientists, yet has no problem whatsoever trusting a certain biblical translation over another. And *gasp* it happens to be the one that the Jehovah Witnesses are pushing...what a coincidence!
asdfasdf32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 09:26 PM   #35
Pooh-Bah
 
kb coolman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: must...not...feed...trolls
Posts: 5,068
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alter2Ego View Post
ALTER2EGO -to- KB COOLMAN:

"He is the image of the invisible God, the FIRSTBORN of all CREATION;.." (Colossians 1:15 -- New World Translation)

That verse of scripture is in other English translations of the Judeo-Christian Bible. In other words, the words are genuine. You can dance around trying to explain away the meaning of "firstborn of ALL CREATION" until kingdom come. Nothing you say will change the meaning of the words "all creation"--which refer to EVERYTHING and EVERYONE that was created. In other words, the pre-human Jesus was created.

Below are several renditions of the same verse in other English translations. These are just a few of the many other Bibles that I can produce—and they all say the same thing.



VARIOUS TRANSLATIONS OF COLOSSIANS 1:15

International Standard Version
"The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation."

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
"He who is the image of The Unseen God and is The Firstborn of all creation."

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
"Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:"

New International Version
"He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation."

English Standard Version
"He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation."

New American Standard Bible
"He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation."



Now let's hear your interpretation of the terminology in the scripture below. Keep your eyes on the words in all caps and bold.

"So the Word became flesh and resided among us, and we had a view of his glory, a glory such as belongs to an ONLY-BEGOTTEN SON from a father; and he was full of undeserved kindness and truth." (John 1:14)

The words "firstborn" and "begotten" apply to CREATED BEINGS according to any English dictionary.



DEFINITION OF "BORN": "Born means having been given life."
http://www.yourdictionary.com/born


DEFINITON OF "BEGOTTEN": "Begotten means something created something else or someone fathered a child."
http://www.yourdictionary.com/begotten
I'm not arguing the definition of the words. I'm telling you what the phase actually means. Having the authority, or right, of Firstborn is a recognition of power bestowed by the Father. Saying Jesus is the Firstborn over All Creation is saying God the Father (Jehovah) has given Jesus authority over Creation. This is confirmed other places in scripture.

Look beyond the meaning of the individual words, and understand what the phase meant to the culture. It has nothing to do with being born.

And don't get me started on the NWT...it's a linguistic piece of garbage meant only to conform to a particular theology. Not a single Greeks Scholar was among the translators. It lacks any academic pedigree.
kb coolman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 12:23 AM   #36
Pooh-Bah
 
Wizard-50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 5,170
Get an ESV study Bible

E: i think esvbible.org has a free online app.
Wizard-50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 12:32 AM   #37
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 380
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kb coolman View Post
I'm not arguing the definition of the words. I'm telling you what the phase actually means. Having the authority, or right, of Firstborn is a recognition of power bestowed by the Father. Saying Jesus is the Firstborn over All Creation is saying God the Father (Jehovah) has given Jesus authority over Creation. This is confirmed other places in scripture.
ALTER2EGO -to- KB COOLMAN:

There is absolutely no difference between "firstBORN over all CREATION and "firstBORN OF all CREATION." The keywords are BORN and CREATION--both of which indicate that Jesus was created.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kb coolman View Post
I'm not arguing the definition of the words. I'm telling you what the phase actually means. Having the authority, or right, of Firstborn is a recognition of power bestowed by the Father. Saying Jesus is the Firstborn over All Creation is saying God the Father (Jehovah) has given Jesus authority over Creation. This is confirmed other places in scripture.

Look beyond the meaning of the individual words, and understand what the phase meant to the culture. It has nothing to do with being born.
ALTER2EGO -to- KB COOLMAN:

And therein likes your problem and the problem of those who chose to cling to falsehoods. They isolate words from the context, and then they give their interpretation of the isolated word--while deliberately ignoring the context. This is the ploy you're using, as noted by what you wrote in your previous post, copied below:

Quote:
Originally Posted by kb coolman View Post
The 'Firstborn of all Creation' argument is a strictly JW teaching, meant to justify their own teachings. 'Firstborn of all Creation' is a position of authority, nothing more. The Firstborn is the son who recieves the full inheritance from the Father. While it typically was the first born son, that was not a requirement of the position. If the first born was unworthy, or died, then the second born inherited the title of Firstborn.

To say Jesus is the Firstborn over all Creation is a statement of his authority, not his birth right.
ALTER2EGO -to- KB COOLMAN:

Did you see what you did when you focused only on the word "firstborn"and ignored its scriptural context? You were then able to apply ancient Jewish cultural meaning to the word "firstborn" alone. However, when the words "firstborn of ALL CREATION" remain together, the meaning is abundantly clear: the word "firstborn" in the latter instance is with reference to the first entity that was created out of ALL OTHER created beings.

Without context, one can read a word and assign whatever meaning one chooses to assign to that word. It is the context--the surrounding words, verses, and chapters--that give the correct meaning to individual words and individual verses of scriptures. People who wish to maintain erroneous beliefs routinely do what you're doing here: they ignore context because context destroys their false beliefs.
Alter2Ego is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 01:09 AM   #38
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 380
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kb coolman View Post
I'm not arguing the definition of the words. I'm telling you what the phase actually means. Having the authority, or right, of Firstborn is a recognition of power bestowed by the Father. Saying Jesus is the Firstborn over All Creation is saying God the Father (Jehovah) HAS GIVEN Jesus authority over Creation. This is confirmed other places in scripture.
ALTER2EGO -to- KB COOLMAN:

True, the Bible does say Jehovah HAS GIVEN Jesus Christ authority over humans and over all of the other angels. But that doesn't change the fact that Jesus is himself a created being.


"And Jesus approached and spoke to them, saying: 'All authority has been given me in heaven and on the earth.' " (Matthew 28:18 -- NWT)

"And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth." (Matthew 28:18 -- KJV)


You acknowledged in your post above that "God the Father (Jehovah)
has given Jesus authority over Creation." That admission on your part debunks your whole argument for Jesus and Jehovah being the same person in a trinity. "HAS GIVEN" are the key words. Are you telling this forum that Jehovah "has given authority" to HIMSELF--being that he and Jesus Christ are supposedly one God split up into three? Now tell me, what sense does that make?


In a previous post that I wrote you, I directed your attention to the scripture at John 1:14 which again indicates that the pre-human Jesus was created. There, he is referred to as "only-BEGOTTEN son." Below is the quotation of John 1:14 again, along with the definition of the words "born" and "begotten." Again, keep your eyes on the words in all caps and bold in the scripture quoted below.


"So the Word became flesh and resided among us, and we had a view of his glory, a glory such as belongs to an ONLY-BEGOTTEN SON from a father; and he was full of undeserved kindness and truth." (John 1:14)


I find it quite telling that you avoided that particular scripture and ignored my previous request that you give your interpretation of the word "begotten." The words "firstborn" and "begotten" apply to CREATED BEINGS according to any English dictionary.


DEFINITION OF "BORN": "Born means having been given life."

http://www.yourdictionary.com/born


DEFINITION OF "BEGOTTEN": "Begotten means something created something else or someone fathered a child."
http://www.yourdictionary.com/begotten
Alter2Ego is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 01:23 AM   #39
Pooh-Bah
 
Wizard-50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 5,170
Jesus submitting to the Father's will does not remove his divinity. Nor does his role diminish his divinity. Similarly, when you go to a restaurant the wait staff is no less human than you are.
Wizard-50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 02:05 AM   #40
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 380
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizard-50 View Post
Jesus submitting to the Father's will does not remove his divinity. Nor does his role diminish his divinity. Similarly, when you go to a restaurant the wait staff is no less human than you are.
ALTER2EGO -to- WIZARD-50:

At no time did I say Jesus is not divine. A divine spirit person is considered a god. Jesus is a god--just like all of the other angels are gods. He is in fact the most powerful of Jehovah's angels, and it was by means of Jesus that all other things were created. Therefore, his divinity is not in question. But the scriptures say he was created by Jehovah. Therefore, he could not possibly be CO-EQUAL with Jehovah just as he is not in a trinity "godhead" with Jehovah.


"{15} He is the image of the invisible God, the FIRSTBORN OF ALL CREATION; {16} because by means of him all other things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All other things have been created through him and for him. {17} Also, he is before all other things and by means of him all other things were made to exist." (Colossians 1:15-17)
Alter2Ego is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 06:18 AM   #41
centurion
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Manchester/London
Posts: 110
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

Quote:
Originally Posted by uke_master View Post
There is a very strong correlation between posters with very unorthodox and consistent posting styles and between very bad posters. Take RedManPlus or GreatestIAM as other examples. Alter2ego, if you want some respect, please for the love of God or whatever else you believe in, just use a normal posting style like everybody else. No colors. No stupid formatting. No calling things "web links". No third person identifying of the guy you have just quoted. Seriously, what possible reason can you have for doing this nonsense? Just stop.
apparantly he's a fan of the image. Its unbelievable, but kind of also gives the impression of a troll. Even splendour posts normally.
Fablisitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 10:07 AM   #42
Pooh-Bah
 
kb coolman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: must...not...feed...trolls
Posts: 5,068
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

Poe's law is such a bitch. A2E is either a great troll, or a dyed in the wool JW. Choosing between the two is impossible.

Me: It's a friggin' metaphor.
A2E: DICTIONARY DEFINITION OF CREATION AND FIRSTBORN
kb coolman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 10:26 AM   #43
veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,770
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kb coolman View Post
Poe's law is such a bitch. A2E is either a great troll, or a dyed in the wool JW. Choosing between the two is impossible.

Me: It's a friggin' metaphor.
A2E: DICTIONARY DEFINITION OF CREATION AND FIRSTBORN
Its funny that when you go

it means x when the bible says x.

He then goes

Its a frigging metaphor.
neeeel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 02:07 PM   #44
Pooh-Bah
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,367
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

The sad thing is that clearly this person is putting in a lot of effort and research and whatever which is great and can add to the forum. But you have to be willing to really internalize what others are saying and stubbornly refusing to violate an exceedingly unorthodox posting style is indicative of the larger problems
uke_master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 02:17 PM   #45
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 380
Re: Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokerlogist View Post
Also the term "godhead" is used in the Bible more than once.
ALTER2EGO'S PREVIOUS RESPONSE:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alter2Ego View Post
The word GODHEAD is a fabricated word that did not appear in the original writings of the Bible. The last book of the Bible was completed in 41 AD. That is, in the first century AD. The word GODHEDE appeared for the first time in a 14th Century AD English translation of the Bible--1,300 years after the fact. The translator who introduced the word GODHEDE was named John Wycleffe. He was a Catholic Priest. He belonged to the very same religion responsible for the Trinity dogma. By the time the King James Version was released in 1611, the word GODHEDE had been changed to GODHEAD.
ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:

I made an error when I wrote above that the last book of the Bible was written in 41 AD.

Correction, the last books of the Bible to have been written under Divine inspiration were completed in 98 AD/CE. These are the four books of John
(John, John 1, John 2, and John 3). All four books were written by the Apostle John.
Alter2Ego is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive