Official RGT random **** thread

[Splendour]

No Greater Love by Rachel Lampa:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN2vyy__os8

Before I knew your name

You knew my every breath

Before I found my way

You knew my every step

Before I knew everything that I need

You gave it all to me

[Original Position]

I am going to remind people that we already have threads where you can post links to articles and videos. If you want to occasionally post a link here that is fine, but mostly they should go in those threads.

[Doggg]

I was thinking about Black Friday today, and how soon after, I found this sub-forum. My first 500 posts are almost exclusively from the HUSNG forum. I was studying HUSNG poker for a solid year and had memorized Nash and probably had reviewed almost every single hand posted in that forum. I had just moved up to the 30's and was taking occassional shots at the 50's. But as far as I was concerned, there was only NVG and HUSNG. But poker was gone (except for a month of full-time play live, which I would never recommend to anyone). And now I just have RGT and a few bucks on Cake.

So there is my random **** for the day. I miss Pokerstars

[Splendour]

Mods why are atheists debating in the quote and article (sticky) threads?

[Splendour]

Lol...I ran a thread on Chomsky a while back and we went off on an Obama birth certificate tangent.

Many people in RGT argued Obama's birth certificate was valid but now Obama's own lawyer is claiming it's a forgery.

If you google "Obama's Lawyer Admits" you get pages and pages of hits on it.

[zumby]

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama...ineligible.asp

[Splendour]

Snopes.com plays semantics with Examiner Obama eligibility article by Jeffrey Phelps
http://www.examiner.com/article/snop...bility-article

Quote:

"Instead of actually taking the case head on and trying to truly determine whether or not the birth certificate is actually real or not, Snopes.com’s team of very questionable “researchers” merely decided to argue semantics Friday, instead of facts."

[batair]

Dumb law in any case. If i want someone who was not born here to be my president i should be able to vote for them.

[Splendour]

What law?

[batair]

The law/rule/whatever you want to call it keeping non naturalized citizens form being president.

[Splendour]

Originally Posted by batair

Dumb law in any case. If i want someone who was not born here to be my president i should be able to vote for them.

There's still a Constitutional requirement. A personal preference like you've expressed still requires a Constitutional amendment and there is none.

[batair]

Then there should be one because its a dumb law.

[Splendour]

Originally Posted by batair

Then there should be one because its a dumb law.

What's dumb about ascertaining loyalties? When they wrote the Constitution they had just fought a war, the American Revolution, which included internal insurgents.

The President of the United States commands the Armed Forces.

Imagine if the Germans could have ousted Hitler (he was Austrian not German) on a technicality which might not be such a technicality. We could have averted WWII.

And what's with his inability to produce a birth certificate?

Did you know the Armed Forces take an oath to protect against both foreign and domestic enemies?

[batair]

Since you dont like to debate or argue i wont. GL with your birther thing.

[zumby]

FSTDT