Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Other Topics > Religion, God, and Theology

Notices

Religion, God, and Theology Discussion of God, religion, faith, theology, and spirituality.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-27-2012, 12:45 PM   #91
veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,770
Re: A healthy self

Quote:
How would you define the your in the above?
I need to use conventional language, otherwise we get nowhere. So me using You or I doesnt not indicate the actual presence of a you or I.


Quote:
Originally Posted by nek777 View Post
However, if you stub your toe - what is it that hurts?
There may be pain, and part of a body that hurts, but there is no self (sitting in the head, or wherever) experiencing that pain.
neeeel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2012, 01:05 PM   #92
adept
 
nek777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 728
Re: A healthy self

Quote:
Originally Posted by neeeel View Post
I need to use conventional language, otherwise we get nowhere. So me using You or I doesnt not indicate the actual presence of a you or I.




There may be pain, and part of a body that hurts, but there is no self (sitting in the head, or wherever) experiencing that pain.
I am going to go out on a limb and say that it appears we are in agreement.
nek777 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2012, 03:46 PM   #93
veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,128
Re: The self-referential loop of consciousness

At present we have earth consciousness, or that of sensory reality. Its the consciousness with an object.Within this state of consciousness we develop a "I" consciousness. Of course in the eastern perspective often seen in this forum there is no "I" but an illusion. It appears that in reaching "higher" levels of consciousness the eastern thought disdains the earthly consciousness and "tells us how it really is".

Speaking to the earth consciousness and the "Ego" or "I" of Man "touch" is of primary consideration. What we call our "sense of touch" is in reality a withdrawing away from the object centered consciousness. A sense of sound or taste or sight brings to the human "I" a piece of that external reality, but the sense of touch "flees" from the external and in this the human being obtains a sense of "self". this, you have to experience in yourself thus becoming cognate.

This experience of the "I" in the material world as the "sense of touch" is the sense image of the "I' itself. Man has "sense" experiences in this earthly habitat and in this has "I" or "Ego" experiences within this realm of consciousness; the "self " experience is within the "sense of touch".

Now, this "self experience" or "experience of the "I"" is in image form and is not the actual "I". the actual "I' of the human being sits at the beginning of our earthly life awaiting to receive the fruits of this earthly life. the actual "I" is out of space and time, the high spiritual reality of the human being.

Deniers of the "I" as illusion come from an atavistic knowledge which in its time did not see clearly the "I" being as these meditations were part and parcel brought forth within a consciousness to which the earthly or material was seen as illusion, or "maya". Ensconced within the spiritual reality the ancient Indian saw the material as illusion for he saw the spiritual underpinnings of what we call the material. He had very little to do with the external and lived within his inner light which was consequential to an inspiration from higher beings, of multiplicity. He knew he was within the spiritual reality and that he supped with his Gods who were in effect his "Ego" force, not his, but theirs.

Mankind has progressed (or even regressed as some might think), to a state of lack of knowledge of the spiritual worlds as the ancient Indian knew of, but in compensation mankind has come to a "Ego" or "I" centered consciousness bereft of spirituality. we are becoming aware of our "I" , always present but of which we were not always aware. This of course leads to the question of Egocentricity or Egoistic behavior and mankind's dilemma.

the message from the east is that the "Ego" is allusion and others state that it is "perverse" or "bad" . Destruction of "Ego' behavior is called for in many religious or occult presentations. The knowledge of Good and Evil, to which the ancient Indian had little need for his actions because he had not come to the point where he was released from the spiritual world as an "Ego" being. We have an "I" or "Ego" and are released into the earthly world with this "Ego" to which our moral tone comes forth. We live within the moral sphere and this is where the "I" has his home, the home of Man which is the world of the spirit. Just as we have laws of nature so does the spiritual world have the laws of morality to which the human being is working towards, with the "Ego". The substance of the spiritual world is the moral just as matter is the substance of the earthly realm.

The "Ego" lives and confronts knowledge of "good and evil" and in this Man prepares for a return to the spiritual as independent beings, of "Ego" beings ensconced within a spirituality sans time and space. the development of the human being is to have the "consciousness without an object" and this is obtained through reembodiment of the spirit, or reincarnation and karma, within the earthly sphere..

If one says that one wants to "get to the beyond" then all one has to do is die and you'll get to the beyond but the earth is our importance for in this we get to the beyond, in time, as independent beings, the noble work of Man.

Self seeking and self immolation are two poles of the polarity of mankind. One says to only see the earth(Ahriman) while the other says that you are better than the earth, "come to my realm"(Lucifer).

The middle way where light becomes the colors of red and yellow and darkness becomes the colors of blue and violet is the the Christ Way, the Impulse of Golgotha, our guide to the independence of being within the spiritual realm, in effect our guide after death. this, only obtained while on the earth.

Last edited by carlo; 07-27-2012 at 03:56 PM.
carlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2012, 06:06 PM   #94
Formerly red
 
Howard Beale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,391
Re: What we see is like a cinema show

Quote:
Originally Posted by neeeel View Post
Ha, no you arent, because you dont exist.
If a waiter spills a bowl of spaghetti on you he doesn't have to apologize?

Howard Beale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2012, 08:16 PM   #95
adept
 
nek777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 728
Re: What we see is like a cinema show

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale View Post
If a waiter spills a bowl of spaghetti on you he doesn't have to apologize?

Well, independent of the notion of a self existing from its own side - a waiter doesn't have to apologize if he doesn't want. However, if the waiter does apologize, how do you know the apologize is sincere?
nek777 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 02:24 AM   #96
Formerly red
 
Howard Beale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,391
Re: What we see is like a cinema show

Quote:
Originally Posted by nek777 View Post
Well, independent of the notion of a self existing from its own side - a waiter doesn't have to apologize if he doesn't want. However, if the waiter does apologize, how do you know the apologize is sincere?
Soul-read, ldo. I've had lots of practice.
Howard Beale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 06:36 PM   #97
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Posts: 85
Smile Mystical interpretation of Christianity

The mystical intrepretation of Christianity, like explained by mystics as Meister Eckhart ea. runs a bit like this: God the father is the transcendent Godhead (the Hindoes call this Brahman), his Son is the incarnate God as it is manifested in the world (or: saguna Brahman, also called the Atman or the embodied Self, living in us all).

This Self is the divine living in us, also known as Christ consciousness or the Holy Ghost. It is different from the personal self, which has indeed its limitations, while the Self (the indwelling Christ) connects us to our source God, the Father (or Brahman).

The mystic identifies with the divine Self and not with the personal self. By becoming the Self she realizes she is imago dei, or 'born in the likeness of God'. 'I and the Father are One', as the Master said.
Jan F. Brouwer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 06:39 PM   #98
True Facts
 
asdfasdf32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dexter's table
Posts: 8,896
Re: Mystical interpretation of Christianity

11 posts and 7 threads started. RGT is not your personal blog.
asdfasdf32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 09:51 AM   #99
banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Don't forget. You are loved by God.
Posts: 18,896
Re: Mystical interpretation of Christianity

Jesus Christ has always been the Doctor of the World's Soul.

What point are you trying to make OP?

You do know you're posting where a lot of people have rejected the care of their Doctor don't you?

Reminds me of Tony Soprano going to see his psychiatrist in that show The Sopranos. Imagine his psychiatrist had just told him to change his mafioso ways instead of exploring his psyche. She'd of been out of all her fees... because Tony Soprano would have been cured and not had any more nightmares to talk to her about.
Splendour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 11:34 AM   #100
adept
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,176
Re: The Pursuit of Love and Happiness

To pursuit is a 'must' (regarding mystic: you must pursue) although it doesn't help. Anyone who understands this, he might go ahead and give us an example.
To Splendour: Truth is Jesus was the name of flesh and blood, but his being was not. This means he can be at any time anywhere with other names.
shahrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 05:56 PM   #101
journeyman
 
EnlightenedRaise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Proverbs 14:5-9
Posts: 325
Re: Mystical interpretation of Christianity

for the love of the Transcendant Godhead, just call the personal Self your EGO!
You have one ya know!

we all share it too in varying variety, so nothing is truly personal..
only sneaky little ego believes it is all alone in anything..
j/k, whatever floats your boat..

oh..and i can't help but notice..
there really is no better way to cook off an atheist's grenade for them than to refuse to engage in debate..BOOM. lol..
hilarious..and i'm not condoning what you are doing here because this forum is somewhat of a modicum of discussion...i suppose..
but hats off for self-control..or lack of follow-up, whichever works for you.


---------------

anyway..we must not be led to believe that the good is possible without the bad, so forgive me if i am digging too deep..

but..
the true "mystic" identifies with Universal Self AND Personal Self(Ego) if one is truly honest with oneself..
after all, being able to count and make PBJ sandwiches is pretty useful, imo.

and we don't so much "Become" our true Selves..rather i come to the Realization that i have Always been that Essence which is One and the Same with the Father..
so its much more like an Undoing than anything that I am doing..
for i am not Father..i am the Son, and the created can never be greater than the Creator..

it is in the becoming aware of a greater awareness within ourselves where one gains insight to all interpretations seemingly "mystical" in nature..
the best part is when you realize that there isn't anything mystical about anything, only that which is considered as such by the blind..

and the robed sages give each other a knowing smile and nod..and happily stroll along..
EnlightenedRaise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 05:59 PM   #102
veteran
 
zumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: P(G) = 0.02%
Posts: 3,231
Re: Mystical interpretation of Christianity

It's like a Stanley Unwin convention ITT
zumby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 06:53 PM   #103
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Posts: 85
Re: Mystical interpretation of Christianity

Quote:

the true "mystic" identifies with Universal Self AND Personal Self(Ego) if one is truly honest with oneself..
after all, being able to count and make PBJ sandwiches is pretty useful, imo.

Yes, that is a point worth considering, from a mystical point of view, because the dualism limited~unlimited is also transcended in the Self. Or as Ramana Maharshi was wont to ask: "are there two Selfs then?" From a logical point of view this becomes a bit complicated because this seems to contradict what is said above. But it amounts to something like 'the Self is both dual and One, limited and unlimited (and neither, because of the transcendence).
Jan F. Brouwer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 07:03 PM   #104
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Posts: 85
Re: Mystical interpretation of Christianity

Quote:
for i am not Father..i am the Son, and the created can never be greater than the Creator..
The Father and the Son are One, so you are also the Father. In Reality there is no creator. There is only the act of creation. The Father and the Son disappear in their own apophasis.
Jan F. Brouwer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 08:44 PM   #105
journeyman
 
EnlightenedRaise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Proverbs 14:5-9
Posts: 325
Re: Mystical interpretation of Christianity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan F. Brouwer View Post
Yes, that is a point worth considering, from a mystical point of view, because the dualism limited~unlimited is also transcended in the Self. Or as Ramana Maharshi was wont to ask: "are there two Selfs then?" From a logical point of view this becomes a bit complicated because this seems to contradict what is said above. But it amounts to something like 'the Self is both dual and One, limited and unlimited (and neither, because of the transcendence).
yes, logical linear thinking tends to fail in satisfyingly conveying accuracy concerning non-dualistic concepts..
i suck at it too, but this discussion may serve to more accurately portray Truth..

i can appreciate how it can be perceived dualistically and in unitary fashion..
although in duality, eternal logic loops piss me off, so it's fun to have something to point that finger at..(silly little ego)
thank you..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan F. Brouwer View Post
The Father and the Son are One, so you are also the Father. In Reality there is no creator. There is only the act of creation. The Father and the Son disappear in their own apophasis.
I am One with Father, in essence..so yes, in this sense, I am Father.
but it's quite far from literally understood, from my perspective..
my unique facet of consciousness is merely an aspect of an aspect of the One True Living God..
to equate myself with the origin of that power of Creation is plainly delusional, IMO..
my existence will always be more illustrative of my "servant" status than of that as an "equal"..

perhaps that will change in "time" as nothing in this existence possesses any true permanence..
i wonder if aj has any input here, as he and i have chatted about this notion recently..

------------

if there is no Creator, then how can there be an act of Creation?

the song of Creation is sung by Father in One verse: the Universe.

He is the Greatest Teacher, and Learner..

we could still stand to learn a few things...

------------

here's a slightly off-topic but fun question:

do you believe there is a difference between you and i having this discussion, and Father "contemplating"?
or could it be possible that this is merely 2 different perceptions of the same event?

what say you, little God?
and don't bail out with "anything is possible.."
please..put some hair on my back!

thanks for being me..

love to you..
EnlightenedRaise is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive