STFU emo kid, my God can kick your ass.

Well your memory might be better than mine. Even among posters I recognize, I don't necessarily recall what their beliefs are. Like I recognize your handle but wasn't sure if you were christian, atheist, or what.

This is the third time you've posted that.

Sounds about right

(sorry RLK, jokes bruv )

This isn't quite right, Occam's razor tells us that the explination that forces us to account for the least number of unknowns is most likely to be true.

What you've described here is the coloquial understanding, but its misleading. If something is complex, but we can account for everything about it, it would satisfy occam's razor better then a less complex answer in which we have to make more assumptions.

Lol. I think I am going to go watch TV. I love the programming here because they never show reruns.

Can't tell if you're serious. If you are, I was just going off what you've wrote in the past.

As for your last question - that was my point. I was a little surprised at the results.

This is one of my favorite ideas in debates in general. Being able to pass the Turing test seems like a basic feature of understanding the debate in the first place.