Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Other Topics > Religion, God, and Theology

Notices

Religion, God, and Theology Discussion of God, religion, faith, theology, and spirituality.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2012, 12:29 AM   #211
grinder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: salem, new jersey
Posts: 412
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

and op.. part of your argument is that natural selection and evolution is so simple , and so mindless that it doesnt need a designer. It is mindless and blind. Well, just because it doesnt need a designer , does not mean that it did not have one. God certaily could have put a simple, mindless process in place, and with his forsight know the end game led to an intelligent being that would be his "people" no matter what. There is no way for you to say that that is not a possibility, and if you think you can.. well.. then you are the one in denial.

Last edited by jay0582; 02-04-2012 at 12:44 AM.
jay0582 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 02:53 AM   #212
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: I ain't been beat yet.
Posts: 16,788
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Quote:
Originally Posted by jay0582 View Post
I know! Reading this thread, it is increasingly annoying the the OP does not get this fact, and everytime you point it out he just ignores it. In fact, he doesn't just ignore it, he goes on to once again make it seems as if people on the opposite side of his argument simply do not understand what he is trying to say. So, he has to explain it again for them. My goodness. It's not that they do not understand what you are trying to say. It is that they have formed an alternative theory / opinion, but they are still using all of the facts that you have at your disposal to do so, if not more. We get it. Natural selection drives evolution, and all of that is driven by different environmental stimuli all of which are random and it appears that it could not be part of a design because of that. In fact they could be manipulated in an experiment like the one you mentioned to produce different outcomes. Okay? None of that proves that God was not involved in the process of evolution. There are so many holes in your logic.

What if God began the process, and there were many different satisfactory outcomes that could occur. What if God guaranteed himself the same end game or a similar end game when creating this recipe that created something that appeared to be random, but it was only random to an extent. Meaning all paths would lead to an intelligent being, but not necessarily humans in their current form. God could know all of that ahead of time, but allow randomness within a certain set of paramaters to take place. There are so many other arguments that could be made that poke holes in your stance that you think is rock solid. Fact is, you just do not know for sure.

Something similar to a huge maze that had thousands of different paths you could take, but all of those paths led you to the same exit and there were zero dead ends.
I wonder why no one makes a connection between patterns and the God of the bible and see that there are a lot of patterns in both DNA and fossil patterns just like there are a lot of patterns given in the Old Testament.

Don't patterns indicate a mind that organizes things?

How would a primitive people be sophisticated enough or devious enough to say they received patterns from God on how to build his tabernacle, priest clothing, temple, etc. unless they had received them from Him?
Splendour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 03:01 AM   #213
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Stu Pidasso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hiding from Mat "Slasher" Sklansky
Posts: 12,373
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Quote:
Originally Posted by yodachoda View Post
You may say, "we don't know how evolution originated though." This shows a large misunderstanding of evolution, because if you know how it works you see that this question makes no sense. It is not something that needs any originating. It's not something that needs any inventing or creating, it just happens.
I understand how evolution works and let me tell you "it just doesn't happen" without a lot of fine tuning and tweaking to the system. If it "just happened" there would be evolutionary systems all over the place. Keep in mind that biology...when you get right down to it is just chemistry...and chemistry....when you get right down to it is particle physics.

All that stuff you are learning in kollege about chemistry and biology are just consequences of the undelying fundamental physics which govern everything. Evolution only happens in very specific contrived circumstances even though the same laws which govern it are operating everywhere and on everything.
Stu Pidasso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 03:09 AM   #214
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: I ain't been beat yet.
Posts: 16,788
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu Pidasso View Post
I understand how evolution works and let me tell you "it just doesn't happen" without a lot of fine tuning and tweaking to the system. If it "just happened" there would be evolutionary systems all over the place. Keep in mind that biology...when you get right down to it is just chemistry...and chemistry....when you get right down to it is particle physics.

All that stuff you are learning in kollege about chemistry and biology are just consequences of the undelying fundamental physics which govern everything. Evolution only happens in very specific contrived circumstances even though the same laws which govern it are operating everywhere and on everything.
If you think about the human brain how did it just happen?

Humans have 3 brain systems. The neo cortex seems to have gotten a lot more prominent and important recently in history than the 2 other systems.

The human brain could still be evolving.

A lot of the OT is word pictures like the building blocks we give to children today to teach them the alphabet. Kids don't just read they have to know the basic letters first.

The OT could have been written for a less sophisticated mind than people have today so people indicting the bible for being ancient is absurd. You have to start teaching people at the level they're at not at some modern level people are at today. On top of that God had to transcend time and make those pictures transcend to following generations and the symbolism of the OT does that.
Splendour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 07:03 AM   #215
veteran
 
Husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Playing like it's 2007
Posts: 3,132
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu Pidasso View Post
Why don't computer viruses evolve on their own? There is predator software...like norton whose sole purpose is to destroy them....they self replicate....in the process of self replication there are bound to be occassional errors (file corruptions/mutations).

Is this seriously the best comparison you have? Evolution in humans, animals etc etc can't happen without someone guiding it because computer viruses don't evolve (as they don't have someone guiding their evolution)
Husker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 08:27 AM   #216
veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,053
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Atheists that somehow think evolution disproves God are so fascinating to me.
Matt R. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 09:08 AM   #217
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Stu Pidasso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hiding from Mat "Slasher" Sklansky
Posts: 12,373
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Husker View Post
Is this seriously the best comparison you have? Evolution in humans, animals etc etc can't happen without someone guiding it because computer viruses don't evolve (as they don't have someone guiding their evolution)
You asked for a specific example of something I thought would evolve if evolutionary systems did not require the heavy handed participation of intellect in their inceptions. I gave you an answer.

I never said "Evolution in humans, animals etc etc can't happen without someone guiding it because computer viruses don't evolve (as they don't have someone guiding their evolution)". You said that. Your continued dishonest tactics in this thread have annoyed me to the point where I have decided not carry on any further conversation with you.
Stu Pidasso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 09:45 AM   #218
veteran
 
Husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Playing like it's 2007
Posts: 3,132
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Dishonest tactics? You seem a delicate little soul.

You're the one who has been going on (and on) about evolutionary systems but when asked to give a specific one to compare to human evolution you give us something that really bears no relation whatsoever, therefore bringing the main thrust of your argument down.
Husker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 12:29 PM   #219
veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago IL suburbs
Posts: 2,936
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Here's evolution in a nutshell:

1. When reproduction happens, mistakes happen during DNA replication or during meiosis. These are simply mistakes in nucleotide addition or swapping, or chromosomes not lining up correctly just prior to meiosis. Usually the result is disastrous (ie down syndrome), but sometimes the result provides a beneficial mutation (such as a creature's arm being 5.6 inches long rather than 5.5 inches long). These mutations, that happen in meiosis just prior to birth, then spread to the zygote and then to literally every single cell of the new creature. They don't just disappear, they accumulate in the genome.

2. The environment, either living or non living, causes the non-random death of individuals of a population. Individuals with traits that increase survival are selected to live by the mindless environment. As the Galapagos finch experiment has shown, even less than a 1 mm change in beak size means the difference in life and death for finch populations.

And here's what you need to add for theistic evolution:

1. When reproduction happens, mistakes happen during DNA replication or during meiosis. These are simply mistakes in nucleotide addition or swapping, or chromosomes not lining up correctly just prior to meiosis. But sometimes, and only when humans are not looking, God will create a nucleotide out of thin air and add the nucleotide. He also sometimes temporarily defies the laws of physics and chemistry and rearranges the chromosomes as they are lining up just prior to meiosis. Usually the result is disastrous (ie down syndrome), but sometimes the result provides a beneficial mutation (such as a creature's arm being 5.6 inches long rather than 5.5 inches long). These mutations, that happen in meiosis just prior to birth, then spread to the zygote and then to literally every single cell of the new creature. They don't just disappear, they accumulate in the genome.

2. The environment, either living or non living, causes the non-random death of individuals of a population. Individuals with traits that increase survival are selected to live by the mindless environment. As the Galapagos finch experiment has shown, even less than a 1 mm change in beak size means the difference in life and death for finch populations. But sometimes, only when humans aren't looking, God will temporarily defy the laws of physics and chemistry and turn from an invisible form to a visible form. He will stick his hands into Earth from the sky and physically move certain individuals around to prevent or cause death to certain animals. He may also stick his hands into Earth to cause events (hurricanes, asteroids, ect) that guide evolution to a direction he wants. Again, this only happens when humans aren't looking.
yodachoda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 12:38 PM   #220
Pooh-Bah
 
ganstaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: central nj
Posts: 5,196
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

So even this deep into the thread, you have NO idea what theistic evolution means. No wonder you're baffled.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yodachoda View Post
And here's what you need to add for theistic evolution:

1. When reproduction happens, mistakes happen during DNA replication or during meiosis. These are simply mistakes in nucleotide addition or swapping, or chromosomes not lining up correctly just prior to meiosis. But sometimes, and only when humans are not looking, God will create a nucleotide out of thin air and add the nucleotide. He also sometimes temporarily defies the laws of physics and chemistry and rearranges the chromosomes as they are lining up just prior to meiosis. Usually the result is disastrous (ie down syndrome), but sometimes the result provides a beneficial mutation (such as a creature's arm being 5.6 inches long rather than 5.5 inches long). These mutations, that happen in meiosis just prior to birth, then spread to the zygote and then to literally every single cell of the new creature. They don't just disappear, they accumulate in the genome.

2. The environment, either living or non living, causes the non-random death of individuals of a population. Individuals with traits that increase survival are selected to live by the mindless environment. As the Galapagos finch experiment has shown, even less than a 1 mm change in beak size means the difference in life and death for finch populations. But sometimes, only when humans aren't looking, God will temporarily defy the laws of physics and chemistry and turn from an invisible form to a visible form. He will stick his hands into Earth from the sky and physically move certain individuals around to prevent or cause death to certain animals. He may also stick his hands into Earth to cause events (hurricanes, asteroids, ect) that guide evolution to a direction he wants. Again, this only happens when humans aren't looking.
This is not what we have been claiming. Maybe if you tried to actually understand our claims instead of just pretending we don't know more biology than you, you would be less baffled.
ganstaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 12:45 PM   #221
veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago IL suburbs
Posts: 2,936
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman View Post
So even this deep into the thread, you have NO idea what theistic evolution means. No wonder you're baffled.



This is not what we have been claiming. Maybe if you tried to actually understand our claims instead of just pretending we don't know more biology than you, you would be less baffled.
I admit I haven't read every single page, but I have read most of them. I do know what theistic evolution means, it means God controls evolution, correct? The only way he can control evolution is if he intervenes. If this is wrong, then you must believe evolution is not truly blind and purposeless, right? In other words, if he doesn't intervene, then you must believe he planted the first cell and had the foresight to know exactly what it would evolve into a few billion years later. In other words, you must believe the actual process of evolution involves no random chance or contingent events.
yodachoda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 01:00 PM   #222
centurion
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 152
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Quote:
Originally Posted by yodachoda View Post
Here's evolution in a nutshell:

1. When reproduction happens, mistakes happen during DNA replication or during meiosis. These are simply mistakes in nucleotide addition or swapping, or chromosomes not lining up correctly just prior to meiosis. Usually the result is disastrous (ie down syndrome), but sometimes the result provides a beneficial mutation (such as a creature's arm being 5.6 inches long rather than 5.5 inches long). These mutations, that happen in meiosis just prior to birth, then spread to the zygote and then to literally every single cell of the new creature. They don't just disappear, they accumulate in the genome.
note: my comment below has no bearing on the theistic evolution argument.

not really necessary. can even argue meiosis is completely dispensable for evolution to occur. what meiosis, more specifically recombination and crossing over, provides is the uncoupling of beneficial mutations from deleterious ones.

now before you go off about new mutations in a zygote that didn't exist in the parent, consider whether we can differentiate between mutations during germline mitosis and mutations introduced during meiosis, and how many of those changes we can infer are the results of meiotic errors.

Last edited by Polycomb; 02-04-2012 at 01:19 PM. Reason: i negleted to mention mutations during early development before the establishment of the germiline
Polycomb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 01:04 PM   #223
veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,053
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

yodachode,
You seem to believe that with "theistic evolution", when there is a genetic modification from one generation to the next, that the "laws of physics and chemistry are being broken". When this exact same modification occurs in "atheistic evolution", no laws of physics or chemistry are being broken.

Can you hash this out in as much detail as you can handle? In particular, could you please note which laws of physics or chemistry are being broken when one of these modifications takes place?
Matt R. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 01:04 PM   #224
veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago IL suburbs
Posts: 2,936
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas View Post
I just wanted to address this. This statement is nonsensical. I have seen others tout this before as if it has some sort of meaning. 100% of living organisms that died before humans are dead. For that matter 100% of all living organisms that are dead are dead! Why would God do this! Do you see how absurd of a statement that is? What difference does it make whether or not we classify a living organism/being as A or B? A species is a relatively arbitrary classification.

Your statement tries to give the impression that species going extinct is a bad things. Making it sound like the earth is not conducive to life. Which is obviously not the case. Often times it is only when one species goes extinct that another can arise.

Could you imagine what the earth would look like if all species that have ever existed still existed! Why God, why didn't you make life easier for us by keeping the Dinosaurs around?
*This was a reply to my statement that 95-99% of all species have gone extinct before humans arrived*

Any species that went extinct and did not give rise to future species is a complete waste, unless God purposely evolved that species in order to influence a different, important species (such as one that would give rise to humans). But if God did this, evolved a certain species because it would affect a different species, wouldn't it be a lot simple and easier to just guide the important species?

Your statement is true ONLY for ancestors of humans or any creature living on Earth today. But literally all of that 95-99% of species that went extinct were species that branched away AFTER a speciation event occurred between them and us/current living species. It's impossible for one of those species that went extinct to have been our ancestor because then we wouldn't exist today.
yodachoda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 01:08 PM   #225
Pooh-Bah
 
ganstaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: central nj
Posts: 5,196
Re: I am baffled by theistic evolutionists

Quote:
Originally Posted by yodachoda View Post
I admit I haven't read every single page, but I have read most of them. I do know what theistic evolution means, it means God controls evolution, correct? The only way he can control evolution is if he intervenes. If this is wrong, then you must believe evolution is not truly blind and purposeless, right? In other words, if he doesn't intervene, then you must believe he planted the first cell and had the foresight to know exactly what it would evolve into a few billion years later. In other words, you must believe the actual process of evolution involves no random chance or contingent events.
God doesn't need to intervene to have controlled evolution -- simply setting up the right start conditions and rules would suffice.

Though I do have to say that I spoke too strongly in my last post. Surely anyone believing in God has no problem with God being supernatural and being able to defy physics. Though I haven't seen this being the claim wrt theistic evolution in this thread, I don't see why it's not a possibility. And it's a possibility that you also can't show to be wrong. It really should be no more ridiculous to you than our belief in God to begin with.

As for randomness, we've been over this before. Here's what I believe to be my last post that dealt with this topic of randomness in a thread of yours from 2 months ago: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...6&postcount=64

The very next post of yours didn't address this anymore, but instead started with: "Here's a slight digression..."
ganstaman is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive